Attitudes towards spirituality and spiritual care among nursing employees in hospitals Stališča do duhovnosti in duhovne oskrbe med zaposlenimi v zdravstveni negi v bolnišnicah

Introduction: Understanding spirituality and spiritual care is a prerequisite for holistic care. The research goal was to describe nurses' attitudes towards spirituality and spiritual care.Methods: The study was carried out between 2015 and 2016 using a quantitative non-experimental method. The Spirituality and Spiritual Care Rating Scale Questionnaire was given to a sample of 182 nursing care employees, mostly women (n = 153, 88.4 %), with completed higher (n = 93, 53.8 %) or secondary (n = 75, 43.4 %) education, from four Slovenian hospitals. The questionnaire had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.83).Results: The highest agreement (x = 4.27, s = 0.82) was reached on the statement which describes spiritual care as respecting patient's privacy, dignity, cultural and religious beliefs. Participants also agreed with the statement that they provide spiritual care by demonstrating kindness, care, and cheerfulness (x = 4.2, s = 0.76), but they expressed uncertainty about the statement that spirituality and spiritual care are fundamental aspects of nursing care (x = 2.88, s = 1.08).Discussion and conclusion: Participants connect spirituality with an understanding of themselves and the world, rather than only with religion and sacral objects. The research has confirmed the findings of previous Slovenian studies that nurses give priority to meeting patients' physical needs before spiritual ones probably also as a result of a lack of knowledge and professional guidance on spiritual care.


Introduction
Nowadays, spirituality and spiritual care are important elements of holistic, bio-and psychosocial treatment of individuals (Caldeira, et al., 2014) since the time in one's life characterised by injuries, illnesses and especially dying is a time of uncertainty and distress that is beyond a person's bodily functions (Babnik & Karnjuš, 2014) and triggers questions of sense, hope, meaning, forgiveness and higher forces.Spirituality is a concept that brings together religion, religious rituals, transcendency, reciprocity, connection, peace, energy, meaning, purpose, beliefs, values, hope, motivation and love (Hsiao, et al., 2011).In nursing literature, there is no single definition of spirituality (Pike, 2011).In an attempt to define it, some authors have described it as an intra-mental dimension that includes existential principles and beliefs and guides an individual in their search of meaning and purpose in life as well as in creating positive relationships with others (Molzahn & Sheilds, 2008;Ellis & Narayanasamy, 2009).Slovenian author Skoberne (2002) writes about spirituality in a similar way.She published an article on spirituality and spiritual care in nursing care in Slovenia at a time when the field of spirituality in nursing care was only beginning to develop more intensely.
Also from a psychological point of view, spirituality is understood especially as a dynamic, motivational concept or an internal source (van Dierendonck & Mohan, 2006) that drives individuals in their search for meaning and strength.Paley (2008Paley ( , 2010) ) states that the reason why there are often issues with the definitions related to spirituality in nursing is because the concept is relatively new and changes according to an individual's beliefs, especially their cultural and religious background and in accordance with the society that surrounds them.Gall and colleagues (2011) warn that definitions of spirituality are often unclear and complicated and generally reflect how researchers understand the concept and less frequently how individuals, that is respondents in studies, experience spirituality.One of the more frequent research subjects related to spirituality is the relationship between religion and spirituality or an explanation whether religion and spirituality are synonymous and whether patients who are not religious also have spiritual needs (Pike, 2011, p. 746).An answer to this question has been provided in the nursing literature by McSherry in Cash (2004) with their taxonomy of spirituality in health care.The taxonomy is a continuum of the meaning of spiritually and consists of spirituality defined exclusively on religious and theistic ideals at one end of the continuum, and spirituality based on secular, humanistic and existential elements, on the other end of the continuum.The explanation of spirituality in nursing is based primarily on the understanding of spirituality as a component of an individual's being, which includes the dimensions of immanence and transcendence, and that it can (or not) include religious beliefs and religious practice (Babnik & Karnjuš, 2014, p. 13).
In addition to spirituality, the concept of "spiritual needs" is also used extensively in nursing, although an appropriate definition of spiritual needs is difficult to find in the literature.Buck and McMillan (2012), and Nizon and colleagues (2013) provide a relevant definition by defining spiritual needs as something that a person wants or needs to find the purpose and meaning.Galek and colleagues (2005) list seven domains of spiritual needs: belonging, meaning, hope, morality, beauty and acceptance of death.Sharma and colleagues (2012) emphasise three categories of spiritual needs: psycho-social, spiritual and religious.Psychosocial spiritual needs are described as the needs for support and help from others; spiritual as related to transcendental questions (meaning, hope, forgiveness, peace), while religious spiritual needs comprise the needs for actively practising religion by reading religious texts, participating in religious rituals and talking to a priest or other religious leader (Sharma, et al., 2012).
Spiritual care of patients should lead to a patient's spiritual well-being in the worst moments of their life when because of an illness or injury, life may lose its purpose and meaning (Cook, et al., 2012).The literature does not give a unified answer to what spiritual care is.In professional literature, the distinction between spiritual care as a broader concept and religious care as its subcategory has been established, mainly because of the demands of the society for the equal treatment of patients, regardless of their religiosity (Gedrih & Pahor, 2009).The purpose of spiritual care is to help patients to achieve balance and a holistic understanding of their health condition, to help them in overcoming feelings of hopelessness and uselessness, and to give them support in finding meanings and purpose (Štrancar, 2009).One of the roles of implementing holistic nursing care is the identification of patient's spiritual needs, and planning and carrying out nursing care interventions, for example: help of a priest, ensuring privacy and a peaceful environment, providing the possibility of conversation, listening to a radio programme, music, and considering requests of spiritual and religious nature (special diet, performing religious rituals) (Skoberne, 2002;Karnjuš, et al., 2014).Health care employees are not synonymous in who is responsible for the spiritual care of patients (Babnik & Karnjuš, 2014), but it is probably nursing care employees who are the most suitable professionals to offer spiritual care due to the nature of their work, which requires an on-going contact with patients (Nixon, et al., 2013).Nursing care employees represent the link between the patient and other health care workers and encourage spiritual care in which all the persons who are important to the patient are included (Zakšek, 2010).
Nowadays, nursing care does not deal with the concept of spirituality and spiritual care only during palliative care and alleviation of suffering, but on all the areas of patient care.An example of such approach to spirituality is evident in Great Britain, which after 2010 (McSherry & Jamieson, 2011, 2013) began conducting intense research on the integration of spirituality and spiritual care in nursing care in general, regardless of the field of work and patients that nursing care employees care for.Based on research conducted on a small sample of nursing care employees in Slovenia, Babnik in Karnjuš (2014) have found that the respondents understand spiritual needs of patients and spiritual care as a part of their job since this role is also included in the The code of Ethics (Nurses and Midwives Association of Slovenia, 2014).The importance of spiritual care and consideration of the general spiritual dimension of an individual's actions have also been confirmed by the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International [NANDA-I], which lists various aspects of an individual's well-being amongst the domain of "Life Principles".In this way, nursing diagnoses "Readiness for enhanced spiritual wellbeing" (p.361), "Spiritual distress" (p.372) and "Risk for spiritual distress" (p.374) refer directly to recognising the spiritual dimension of one's actions on a person's wellbeing and their quality of life (Herdman & Kamitsuru, 2014).The concepts of spirituality and spiritual care are regularly found in contemporary textbooks on nursing as with theoreticians Betty Neuman, Margaret Newman, Rosemary Parse in Jean Watson (MacKinlay, 2002;Tanyi, 2002).

Aims and objectives
Spirituality and spiritual care in the field of nursing and health care are not well-researched in Slovenia nor abroad.The purpose of the research was to study the understanding of the concept of spirituality and spiritual care among the employees in nursing in Slovenia.Attitudes are also reflections of understanding a particular subject or a phenomenon, which is why the aim of our research was to study the beliefs and opinions of nursing employees regarding spirituality and spiritual care.Our focus were nursing employees in hospitals where the attention is mainly on treatment and rehabilitation.Such an environment features not only dying patients and terminally ill patients, but also people who have been hospitalised for a shorter or longer period of time.The following research questions were set: − How do nursing employees understand the concept of spirituality and spiritual care?− What are the attitudes of the nursing employees in hospitals regarding the need for training in the field of spirituality and spiritual care?− Which organisations/institutions should offer appropriate support to nursing employees in offering spiritual care according to nursing employees?

Methods
A quantitative descriptive research method with a structured questionnaire was used.

Description of the research instrument
The Spirituality and Spiritual Care Rating Scale (SSCRS) (McSherry, et al., 2002) was used as the instrument for collecting data.The questionnaire is composed of three parts: i) the first one establishes how the respondents understand the concepts "spirituality" and "spiritual care" and what their attitudes towards these concepts are (17 statements); ii) the second part identifies the necessary measures in offering spiritual care to patients, especially in terms of the role of educational institutions and regulatory bodies in ensuring spiritual care to patients and the types of measures that would need to be implemented when offering spiritual care to patients (6 statements); iii) the purpose of the third part is to gather demographic data.The first and second parts of the questionnaire contain statements to which respondents responded (expressed their level of agreement) with a Likert type five-point scale (1 − strongly agree; 2 -agree; 3 -neutral; 4disagree; 5 -strongly disagree).The second part of the statements form part of the original scale as sent to us by the author (McSherry, et al., 2002).For the purposes of adjusting the questionnaire to the Slovene population, bodies that are used in regulating health care and nursing care in the Republic of Slovenia have been included in the formulation of the statements.
Seventeen statements from the first part of the SSCRS questionnaire measure four dimensions of attitudes towards spirituality and spiritual care (McSherry et al., 2002): i) spirituality, ii) spiritual care, iii) religiousness and iv) individualised personal care.In previous studies the first part of SSCRS showed appropriate and consistent level of reliability with values of Cronbach alpha for SSCRS dimensions between 0.64 (McSherry, 1998) and 0.84 (Khoshknab, et al., 2010).Internal scale consistency was calculated (Cronbach alpha) for the first part of the SSCRS questionnaire that is adequate and amounts to 0.83.Internal consistency of the scale (Cronbach alpha) that amounts to 0.38 was also calculated for the second part.The low internal consistency of the second part of the questionnaire was expected, since the second part is not based on statements intended to consistently describe the superior construct (this consistency would be reflected in high internal consistency or Cronbach alpha coefficient), but the statements are mainly specific beliefs regarding the possible approaches and conditions for the implementation of spiritual care.

Description of the research sample
A convenience sample was used, composed of nursing care employees in four Slovene hospitals.From the total of 250 returned questionnaires, 173 were valid (70.7 % sample realisation).153 women (88.4 %) and 20 men (11.6 %) participated in the study.Most respondents had a college or higher-education degree (n = 93, 53.8 %), followed by completed secondary education (n = 75, 43.4 %), five respondents (2.8 %) had a university degree or a master's degree or higher.114 (65.9 %) of respondents classified themselves as religious and 59 (34.1 %) as non-religious.From the respondents that classified themselves as religious, 64 (56.1 %) practises their religion, while the other 50 (43.9%) did not.As depicted in Table 1, the majority of the respondents were aged between 30 and 39 (n = 56, 32.4 %).The majority of the respondents have 11 or more years work experience (n = 103, 63.1 %).With regard to the field of work, employees at the department of surgery were the most responsive to the questionnaire (n = 125, 72.3 %).

Description of the research procedure and data analysis
Before conducting the research, we obtained an official consent from the author of the research works (McSherry, et al., 2002) on spirituality in nursing in Great Britain to use the above-mentioned instrument.We translated the questionnaire into Slovene, so that with statements that could be unclear the research authors translated the original statements into the Slovene language and then back-translated them to English.A review of both translations was performed by a translator.The statements in the second part ("I believe that Ministry of Health should provide clear guidance and support for nurses to deal with spiritual and religious issues", "I believe that Nurses and Midwives Association of Slovenia should provide clear guidance and support for nurses to deal with spiritual and religious issues.")we made adjustments according to the regulatory institutions for health care and nursing care in Slovenia.The survey was performed after obtaining consent from each institution -the hospital.Questionnaires were distributed in cooperation with the hospitals that approved the research.Every research participant had the possibility to withdraw from participation in the research if they wished and the respondents were assured anonymity in conducting the research and research reports.
The anonymity of the participants was assured by gathering a certain number of demographic variables, so only those that are necessary for a suitable description of the sample and were in previous studies (Kaddourah, et al., 2018;Kavosi, et al., 2018) identified as possible influencing factors on attitudes towards spirituality and spiritual care.We calculated descriptive statistics (frequency, mean value, standard deviation) and used statistical tests (ANOVA, t-test).Before conducting the tests, we calculated the mean value for the first part of SSCRS (attitudes towards spirituality and spiritual care) for each participant, thus designing a variable of composite value of attitudes towards spirituality and spiritual care.Levene's test was used to confirm the hypothesis on the homogeneity of variances and normality of the distribution of mean values in the first part of SSCRS (Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test), so we continued by conducting statistical inference tests (t-test, ANOVA).Statistical analyses were conducted by using the SPSS, ver.23 statistical programme (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, ZDA).Values p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
The first step in data analyses was checking the reliability and construct validity (factor analysis) of the part of the instrument that refers to the attitudes of nursing care employees towards spirituality and spiritual care (the first part of SSCRS).Reliability and construct validity of the Slovene version of the SSCRS scale was checked with an analysis of the dimensional structure and with an analysis of the reliability of the entire scale and its dimensions (reliability as internal consistency -Cronbach alpha).Factor analysis was conducted on seventeen statements of the SSCRS scale.The accuracy of the correlation matrix of SSCRS statements for factor analysis was checked with a Bartlett's test of sphericity and with the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (KMO) (Field, 2009) measure.Bartlett's test of sphericity (χ 2 = 924.557,p < 0.01) and measure KMO = 0.821 confirmed the accuracy of the correlation matrix for studying the dimensional structure.Factor analysis (main component method, varimax rotation) excluded 3 factors with eigenvalue value more than 1 that together explain the 51.7 % variance in the respondents' answers.In accordance with the McSherry and colleagues (2002) instrument validation procedure, the cut-off value of factor weights for determining the factor structure was determined with the value ≥ +/-0.35.Factor matrix is depicted in Table 2. Dimensional structure of the SSCRS scale deviates from the four dimensions of attitudes towards spirituality and spiritual care identified by McSherry and colleagues (2002), especially from the perspective of the fourth factor that these authors named "individualised personal care".This factor as an independent dimension has not been confirmed in our research.The internal consistency of each factor with the exception of the first is also lower and questionable (Gliem & Gliem, 2003).Due to a satisfactory level of internal consistency of the entire scale (Cronbach alpha = 0.83) we treated 17 statements as a one-dimensional measure of attitudes towards spirituality and spiritual care.

Results
In the first part of SSCRS the respondents expressed their understanding of the concepts of spirituality and spiritual care and their attitudes towards these concepts.Table 2 shows factors with corresponding statements of the first part of SSCRS, mean value ( ) and standard deviation (s) of the specific statements in the first part of SSCRS.As seen from Table 2, respondents agreed most with statements that define spiritual care of patients and their spirituality.The respondents agreed most ( = 4.27, s = 0.82) with the statement, "I believe nurses can provide spiritual care by having respect for the privacy, dignity and religious and cultural beliefs of a patient."Respondents also agree that they provide spiritual care by means of their attitude towards their patients: "by showing kindness, concern and cheerfulness" ( = 4.2, s = 0.76).The respondents expressed the lowest level of agreement with statements that refer to defining spirituality only from the religious perspective: "I believe spirituality only involves going to church/place of worship" ( = 1.73, s = 0.97); "I believe spirituality is not concerned with a belief and faith in God or a Supreme being" ( = 1.88, s = 1.00); "I believe spirituality does not apply to Atheists or Agnostics" ( = 2.03, s = 0.98).
We were also interested in statistically significant differences between the average score in the first part of SSCRS and demographic data: (i) self-evaluation of respondents, whether they are religious or not (dichotomous variable); (ii) gender (dichotomous variable); (iii) age (age groups).Analysis showed statistically significant differences in the mean score in the first part of SSCRS for self-evaluation of respondents, whether (i) they are religious and (iii) whether they practice religion or not.The mean score in the first part of SSCRS for respondents who answered the question "Are you religious?" with "Yes."(n = 114, = 3.48, s = 0.41) is statistically different from the mean score of the respondents who answered to this question with "No." (n = 58, = 3.23, s = 0.41) as t = 3.76 and is significant on the level, p < 0.001.Among the respondents who answered the question "Do you practice religion?"with "Yes."(n = 64, = 3.48, s = 0.39) and those who answered "No." (n = 102, = 3.33, s = 0.43), there is a statistically significant difference in the evaluation of the statements on the scale (t = 2.32, p = 0.02).For demographic variables of sex and age no statistically significant differences were found for the mean score in the first part of SSCRS: sex (t = 0.13, p = 0.89) and age groups (F = 0.51, p = 0.73).
The second part of SSCRS was aimed at finding which measures should be introduced in relation to offering spiritual care to patients according to nurses.The part contained six statements that the respondents evaluated with a five-point Likert scale.The results are shown in Table 3.
As seen in Table 3, respondents show the highest agreement with the statement that during training they do not obtain enough education and training to provide spiritual care to patients ( = 3.50, s =1.06),

Discussion
The results of the study have shown that nursing care employees included in the study understand spirituality especially in connection to understanding oneself and the attitude a person has towards themselves and the outside world, with the ability to live one's life in every moment, and the least with religion, belief in God or another celestial being and visiting religious institutions.The study conducted by McSherry and Jamieson (2013) among nurses in Great Britain gave similar results.Our research has confirmed that the nursing care employees included in the study have a broad, eclectic and inclusive way of understanding the concept of spirituality, which means that they do not only connect spirituality with belief in God or some other celestial being, but understand it primarily as a motivational construct that guides an individual in their search for peace, hope, other human beings, sense and forgiveness.These are the key concepts that define spirituality (Hsiao, et al., 2011) and may, or may not include religion, religious rituals and objects (Pike, 2011).For some individuals spirituality is a recognition of the existence of a divinity or personal relationship with God, while for others spirituality is a reflection of the most honest Self or the internal being (Mayers & Johnston, 2008).
The mean scores of the first part of SSCRS have shown that the respondents do not understand the concept of spirituality as being the same as the concept of religion and do not strictly differentiate between the concepts of spirituality and religion, but connect them both in a common concept of spirituality.Excluding religion from the concept of spirituality in nursing care in Europe is, above all, a consequence of secularisation (Timmins & McSherry, 2012).Some authors tend to criticise such an approach to understanding the relationship between religion and spirituality (Pesut, 2008;Pike, 2011).By emphasising the separation of spirituality and religion, the literature in nursing wishes to bring attention to the fact that an individual spiritual dimension and spiritual needs should also be recognised with patients who do not define themselves as religious (Pesut, 2008;Gedrih & Pahor, 2009).Strict separation of the two concepts may bring about a belief that an individual is a "non-material being" (Pesut, 2008, p. 170), with a pronounced emotional dimension, without the behavioural dimension or without rituals, practices and spiritual objects that are most often associated with the concept of religion as an institutionalised and tangible spirituality.In this sense, religion may be understood as one of the forms of demonstrating an individual's spirituality, which should be taken into account in the holistic care of patients (Timmins & McSherry, 2012).The results of this research have also demonstrated the same understanding of the concept by the nursing care employees included in the study.
In a study carried out in one of the Slovenian general hospitals, Šolar and Mihelič Zajec (2007, p. 144) identifies the "shared opinions" of nursing staff about "that satisfying spiritual needs is a priority or that their implementation is only possible after performed other activities, which, according to respondents, are an advantage".Despite the fact that our research based on the evaluations of the statements of the first part of SSCRS has shown a broad understanding of the concept of spirituality, average evaluations of the statements of the second part of SSCRS show similar opinions of the interviewed nursing care employees as given by Šolar and Mihelič Zajec (2007), and Babnik and Karnjuš (2014).Regarding the statement that spirituality and spiritual care are the basic aspects of nursing care, the majority of the respondents were undecided, while about the same percentage disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement.This means that spiritual care, according to the interviewed nursing care employees, is not one of the priority areas in nursing care.The fact that the majority of the respondents work in surgery hospital departments may have had an impact on the results.Their experience of providing spiritual care is restricted to clinical settings where patients after an operation do not stay in the hospital or the surgery department for a long time.The concepts of spirituality and spiritual care originate from the biopsychosocial model of health and illness (Borrell-Carrió, et al., 2004) and an upgrade of the latter with the biopsychosocial-spiritual model of care (Sulmasy, 2002).Some recent research (Babnik, et al., 2017) has shown that a holistic care of patients is not a generally accepted model of care in nursing.Spiritual care as the main component of the holistic care has not been given enough attention in practice (Battey, 2012), especially beyond palliative care, since spirituality is not only restricted to the time of dying (McSherry & Jamieson, 2011).The significance of spiritual care may have been diminished also due to the fact that the process of spiritual care has not been entirely defined.Some guidelines of practising spiritual care have been given in the literature after the evaluation of patients' spiritual care and spiritual needs (Elliott, 2011;Daly & Fahey-McCarthy, 2014), but there is a lack of clear guidelines for practising interventions and their evaluations.The answers by the nursing care employees included in the study regarding the first part of SSCRS have shown an understanding of spiritual care in nursing especially as being kind, caring, spending more time with an individual patient, being supportive and respecting the patient's privacy, their dignity, and religious and cultural beliefs.Other research conducted by means of the SSCRS questionnaire in various cultural and religious environments has also shown that the nursing staff generally consider that the attitude towards patients (care, optimism, support) and therapeutic communication were the key elements of spiritual care in nursing (Kostak & Celikkalp, 2016;Kaddourah, et al., 2018) and in other health care fields such as occupational therapy (Mthembu, et al., 2016).
Half of the interviewed nursing care employees were undecided regarding the need for including spiritual care in nursing care training programmes.Similar results had been found by Babnik and Karnjuš (2014).Generally, the interviewed nursing care employees were quite in agreement that they had not obtained enough knowledge with respect to spiritual care as part of nursing care.Findings of other research (McSherry & Jamieson, 2011, 2013;Kostak, & Celikkalp, 2016;Murray & Dunn, 2017) have also shown that nursing care employees lack the knowledge on spirituality and meeting spiritual needs.Therefore, the need to introduce subjects that would deal with spirituality and spiritual care exists.Before taking this step, a clear definition of the process of implementation of spiritual care as part of nursing care is needed (Ramezani, et al., 2014), which the respondents confirmed by expressing the opinion that clear guidelines and instructions for offering suitable and high quality care of patients should be prepared.
The conducted research also has limitations, which refer especially to the psychometric characteristics of the used questionnaire and the size of the sample.The research did not confirm the dimensional structure of the first part of the SSCRS questionnaire.The factor analysis has shown that the statements of the dimension "individualised personal care" of the original questionnaire (McSherry, et al., 2002) connect in a broader superior concept of spiritual care and not in an independent dimension of spiritual care as it is true for the original questionnaire.The reasons for such deviation may be found especially in the way spirituality and spiritual care is understood among the respondents, which can be a consequence of a somewhat specific professional and/or broader cultural environment.Similar findings have been reported by Martins and colleagues (2015) who confirmed the reliability of the first part of the SSCRS questionnaire but not its dimensional structure.Two research works that described the psychometric characteristics of the SSCRS questionnaire do not report on the dimensional structure of this questionnaire (Khoshknab, et al., 2010;van Leeuwen & Schep-Akkerman, 2015).Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the first part of the SSCRS questionnaire requires additional, also intercultural, research.The other limitation refers to sample size.The research only included a small number of nursing care employees, so a national research should be conducted, which could provide a clearer view on the existing current knowledge and opinions of nursing care employees regarding spirituality and spiritual care.The obtained results could then influence the setting of clear guidelines and preparing instructions that would help nursing care employees in holistic care for their patients.

Conclusion
We have shown how a sample of nursing care employees understand the concept of spirituality and spiritual care and their role in recognising the spiritual needs of patients and providing adequate patient care.Results have shown that the respondents associate spirituality especially with understanding themselves and the attitude that they have towards themselves and the outside world, however they disagree that spirituality and religion may be regarded as the same.Understanding the concept of spiritual care is connected especially to respecting an individual person in all respects and by being kind and caring.The respondents are aware of the importance of spiritual care in a clinical environment, but are at the same time undecided whether spirituality and spiritual care are key aspects of nursing care.The latter shows that there is a lack of understanding of the concept of spirituality and spiritual care among the respondents.The reasons may be lack of knowledge; therefore the study programme syllabi of undergraduate and postgraduate courses should be upgraded by providing subjects that are related to spirituality and spiritual care.

Table 2 :
Factor matrix with descriptive statistics for the first part of SSCRS

Table 3 :
Descriptive statistics for the second part of SSCRS

Tabela 3: Deskriptivne statistike za trditve drugega sklopa SSCRS Statement in the second part of SSCRS / Trditve drugega sklopa SSCRS
the statements referring to the Nurses and Midwives Association of Slovenia ( = 3.48, s = 1.09) and the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia ( = 3.46, s =1.08) as those institutions that should set clear guidelines and offer suitable support to nursing care employees in dealing with spiritual and religious issues of patients.

Table 1 :
Demographic data of the study participants

Table 3 :
Descriptive statistics for the second part of SSCRS