Women's satisfaction with the childbirth experience: a descriptive research

Authors

  • Lara Menhart University of Primorska, Faculty of Health Sciences
  • Mirko Prosen University of Primorska, Faculty of Health Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2017.51.4.189

Keywords:

birth, patient satisfaction, perinatal support, healthcare professionals

Abstract

Introduction: Satisfaction is a complex concept, which we often come across when evaluating the childbirth experience. The purpose of the research was to find out the childbirth experiences of women in Slovenia with regard to their level of satisfaction with the provided perinatal care. Methods: The Slovenian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale – Revised was used in a non-experimental quantitative descriptive research (Cronbach α = 0.81). The data were collected through an online questionnaire in February 2017. Convenience sampling was used and 301 women, who gave birth in 2016 in Slovenia, participated. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: The results of the study have shown that the number of births (U = 6802, p = 0.150), education (U = 7493, p = 0.317), age (U = 5142, p = 0.061) and presence of birth partner (U = 2841, p = 0.730) are not statistically significantly correlated with the assessment of childbirth satisfaction. A lower level of satisfaction was also found in cases of caesarean sections of primiparous, in comparison with multiparous, women (U = 430, p = 0.001). A statistically significant difference was established in the correlation between satisfaction and respondents' residential environment (U = 7029, p = 0.039), professional communication, and level of anxiousness of birthing mothers (rs = 0.397, p = 0,000). Discussion and conclusion: The results have shown that healthcare professionals who are present in childbirth are the key factor in contributing to a positive birth experience. The obtained results open up an opportunity for further research on the communication and attitude of health professionals towards birthing mothers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Lara Menhart, University of Primorska, Faculty of Health Sciences

Lara Menhart, dipl. m. s.

Mirko Prosen, University of Primorska, Faculty of Health Sciences

doc. dr. Mirko Prosen, dipl. zn., univ. dipl. org.

References

Bryanton, J., Gagnon, J.A., Johnston, C. & Hatem, M., 2008. Predictors of women's perceptions of the childbirth experience. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 37(1), pp. 24‒28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00203.x PMid:18226154

Carquillat, P., Boulvain, M. & Guittier, J.M., 2016. How does delivery method influence factors that contribute to women's childbirth experiences? Midwifery, 43, pp. 22, 24‒25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.10.002 PMid:27825057

De Orange, F.A, Passini, R., Melo, S.O.A., Katz, L., Coutinho, C.I. & Amorim, M.R.M., 2011. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and non-pharmacological methods of pain relief during normal childbirth and maternal satisfaction: a randomized clinical trial. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 58(1), pp. 114‒116.

Dencker, A., Taft, C., Bergqvist, L., Lilja, H. & Berg, M., 2010. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10(81), pp. 2‒7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-81

Drglin, Z. & Šimnovec, I., 2009. Deset korakov do odličnih obporodnih storitev Mama Otrok. Available at: http://imbco.weebly.com/uploads/8/0/2/6/8026178/imbci_in_slovene.pdf [22. 2. 2017].

Drglin, Z., 2007. Rojstna mašinerija: sodobne obporodne vednosti in prakse na Slovenskem. Koper: Univerza na Primorskem, Znanstveno-raziskovalno središče Koper, pp. 73–74, 93.

Ferrer, C.B.M., Jordana, C.M., Meseguer, B.C., Garcia, C.C. & Roche, M.E., 2016. Comparative study analysing women's childbirth satisfaction and obstetric outcomes across two different models of maternity care. BMJ Open, 6(8), p. 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011362 PMid: 27566632; PMCid: PMC5013466

Gorenak, I. & Goričan, A., 2011. Zadovoljstvo bolnikov v primarnem zdravstvu: primer zdravstvenega doma Šmarje pri jelšah. Zdravstveno Varstvo, 50(3), pp. 175‒184.

Hinic, K.A., 2015. The relationships among perceived stress, birth satisfaction, and breastfeeding self-efficacy in early postpartum women: doktorska naloga. South Orange: Seton Hall University, College of Nursing, pp. 59‒60.

Hodnett, E.D., 2002. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 186(5), pp. 160, 170.

Hollins Martin, C.J., 2014. The Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS). Midwifery Matters, 141, pp. 3‒5.

Hollins Martin, C.J & Martin, R.C., 2015. A survey of women's birth experiences in Scotland using the Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS). European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare, 4(3), pp. 480‒484. https://doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v3i4.1019

Holloway, A. & Kurniawan, S., 2010. How we prepare: childbirth childbirth preparation methods and their effects on satisfaction and labor outcomes. Available at: https://www.soe.ucsc.edu/sites/default/files/technical-reports/UCSC-SOE-10-34.pdf [2. 3. 2017].

Kodeks etike v zdravstveni negi in oskrbi Slovenije in Kodeks etike za babice Slovenije, 2014. Ljubljana: Zbornica zdravstvene in babiške nege Slovenije – Zveza strokovnih društev medicinskih sester, babic in zdravstvenih tehnikov Slovenije.

Macpherson, I., Roqué-Sánchez, V.M., Legget, F.O. & Segarra, I., 2016. A systematic review of the relationship factor between women and health professionals within the multivariant analysis of maternal satisfaction. Midwifery, 41, pp. 75–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.003 PMid:27551856

Milivojević, Z., 2010. Čustveno opismenjevanje: sreča in zadovoljstvo. Available at: http://www.viva.si/Psihologija-in-odnosi/2221/%C4%8Custvenoopismenjevanje-sre%C4%8Da-in-zadovoljstvo [12. 1. 2017].

Mivšek, P.A., 2007. Slovenske ženske v pričakovanju: sprijaznjenje in pasivne ali aktivne in zadovoljne uporabnice obporodnega zdravstvenega varstva. In: Z. Drglin, ed. Rojstna mašinerija: sodobne sodobne obporodne vednosti in prakse na Slovenskem. Koper: Univerza na Primorskem, Znanstvenoraziskovalno središče Koper, pp. 73–74, 93.

Nacionalni inštitut za javno zdravje, 2017. Prisotnost očeta pri porodu po statističnih regijah, Slovenija, letno po spremenljivkah: porodnice, leto, statistična regija. Available at: https://podatki.nijz.si/pxweb/sl/NIJZ%20podatkovni%20portal/NIJZ%20podatkovni%20portal__3%20Zdravstveno%20stanje%20prebivalstva__3b%20Porodi%20in%20rojstva/PIS_TB_4.px/table/tableViewLayout2/?rxid=c7721b98-4898-4f2d-87ec-4de4abcfaeae [22. 3. 2017].

Nilsson, L., Thorsell, T., Wahn, E.H. & Ekström, A., 2013. Factors influencing positive birth experiences of first-time mothers.

Nursing Research and Practice, art. ID 349124 , pp. 1‒6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/349124 PMid:24175090; PMCid:PMC3793576

Prosen, M., 2016. Medikalizacija nosečnosti in poroda kot družbena konstrukcija: doktorska disertacija. Maribor: Univerza v Mariboru, Filozofska fakulteta, pp. 203–207, 216, 263.

Spaich, S., Welzel, G., Berlit, S., Temerinac, D., Tuschy, B., Sütterlin, M., et al., 2013. Mode of delivery and its influence on women's satisfaction with childbirth. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 170, pp. 403, 405.

Sršen, P.T., 2007. Porod: pričakovanja in možnosti. In: Z. Drglin, ed. Rojstna mašinerija: Sodobne obporodne vednosti in prakse na Slovenskem. Koper: Univerza na Primorskem, Znanstvenoraziskovalno središče Koper, pp. 192–193.

Takavol, M. & Dennick, R., 2011. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical education, 2011(2), pp. 53‒55.

Waldenström, U., Hildingsson, I. & Ryding, L., 2006. Antenatal fear of childbirth and its association with subsequent caesarean section and experience of childbirth. An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 13(6), pp. 644‒645. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00950.x

World Medical Association, 2013. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(20), pp. 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 PMid:24141714

World Health Organization, 2017. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Available at: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/. [13. 7. 2017].

Yuenyong, S., O'Brien, B. & Jirapeet, V., 2011. Effects of labor support from close female relative on labor and maternal satisfaction in a thai setting. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 41(45‒46), pp. 50‒52.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-19

How to Cite

Menhart, L., & Prosen, M. (2017). Women’s satisfaction with the childbirth experience: a descriptive research. Slovenian Nursing Review, 51(4), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2017.51.4.189

Issue

Section

Original scientific article