Partners' experiences related to their presence at childbirth
a qualitative descriptive research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2020.54.1.2995Keywords:
partner, childbirth, presence at birth, experiences, active roleAbstract
Introduction: Fathers are often involved in the childbirth process by accompanying their partners at childbirth. Many fathers wish to be present at the birth of their child, but they often cannot imagine what
their role in the labor room would be. The purpose of the study was to look into the experiences of fathers
who were present at childbirth.
Methods: The study is based on qualitative methodology. The sample consisted of five fathers, aged between 25 to 35 years, who participated at two childbirths at least. The data were obtained by partially structured interviews and analyzed with the content analysis method.
Results: Fathers reported that their presence at the childbirth of their child was one of the most beautiful experiences of their lives. However, the experience was described as stressful, but at the same time positive and full of intense emotions. They reported on experiencing feelings such as excitement, anticipation, fear,
anxiety, happiness, joy, relief and pride. Some fathers were more actively involved in the childbirth process than others by the midwives and other health professionals.
Discussion and conclusion: Fathers wish to be treated respectfully and as equals in the couple who are giving childbirth by midwives and other health professionals. Opportunities for further research could be reflected in the connection of fathers' attendance at childbirth with family and partner dynamics as such. It would be also interesting to obtain the experiences of midwives at childbirth where fathers were present.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Abushaikha, L. & Massah, R., 2012. The roles of father during childbirth: the lived experiences of Arab Syrian parents. Health Care for Women International, 33(2), pp. 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2011.610534 PMid: 22242656
Baxter, J.D., McCourt, C. & Jarrett, P.M., 2014. What is current practice in offering debriefing services to postpartum women and what are the perceptions of women in accessing these services: a critical review of the literature. Midwifery, 30(2), pp. 194–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.12.013 PMid: 24491690
Bergström, M., Rudman, A., Waldenström, U. & Kieler, H., 2013. Fear of childbirth in expectant fathers, subsequent childbirth experience and impact of antenatal education: subanalysis of results from a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 92(8), pp. 967–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12147 PMid: 23590647
Bohren, M.A., Hofmeyr, G.J., Sakala, C., Fukuzawa, R.K. & Cuthbert, A., 2017. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017(7), art. ID CD003766. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6 PMid: 28681500; PMCid: PMC6483123
Clemente, N. & Prosen, M., 2013. Priprava moških na rojstvo otroka in očetovstvo. Obzornik Zdravsvene Nege, 47(2), pp. 194–201. Available at: https://obzornik.zbornica-zveza.si/index.php/ObzorZdravNeg/article/view/2927 [28. 7. 2019].
Drglin, Z., 2011. Za zdrav začetek: šola za starše – priprava na porod in starševstvo kot del vzgoje za zdravje: teoretična izhodišča, izvedbeni in metodološki predlog. 1. izd. Ljubljana: Inštitut za varovanje zdravja Republike Slovenije, pp. 39–41. Available at: http://www.nijz.si/sites/www.nijz.si/files/publikacije-datoteke/za_zdrav_zacetek.pdf [28. 7. 2019].
Grahek, P., 2014. Očetovstvo v pozni modernosti: prakse očetovanja v zgodnjem otroštvu: magistrsko delo. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede, pp. 10–31. Available at: https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=30419 [24. 6. 2019].
Green, J. & Thorogood, N., 2004. Qualitative methods for health research. London: SAGE Publications.
Hildingsson, I., Johansson, M., Fenwick, J., Haines, H. & Rubertsson, C., 2013. Childbirth fear in expectant fathers: finding from a regional Swedish cohort study. Midwifery, 30(2), pp. 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.01.001 PMid: 23455031
Johansson, M., Fenwick, J. & Premberg, A., 2015. A metasynthesis of father's experiences of their partner's labour and the birth of their baby. Midwifery, 31(1), pp. 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.05.005 PMid: 24906562
King, N. & Horrocks, C., 2010. Interviews in qualitative research. London: SAGE Publications.
Kodeks etike za babice Slovenije, 2014. Uradni list Republike Slovenije, št. 71.
Kordeš, M. & Smrdu, M., 2015. Osnove kvalitativnega raziskovanja. Koper: Založba Univerze na Primorskem, pp. 51–60.
Ledenfors, A. & Berterö, C., 2016. First-time fathers' experiences of normal childbirth. Midwifery, 40(9), pp. 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.05.013 PMid: 27428095
Longworth, M.K., Furber, C. & Kirk, S., 2015. A narrative review of fathers' involvement during labour and birth and their influence on decision making. Midwifery, 31(9), pp. 844–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.004 PMid: 26165171
Longworth, H.L. & Kingdon, C.K., 2011. Fathers in the birth room: what are they expecting and experiencing: a phenomenological study. Midwifery 27(5), pp. 588–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.06.013 PMid: 20673600
Novak, S., 2015. Starševstvo in delitev družinskega dela: diplomsko delo. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani: Fakulteta za družbene vede, pp. 3–25. Available at: http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/diplomska_dela_1/pdfs/mb11_novak-sasa.pdf [27. 7. 2019].
Perinatalni informacijski sistem Slovenije [PERIS], 2018. Prisotnost očeta pri porodu po statističnih regijah, Slovenija, letno. Available at: https://podatki.nijz.si/Selection.aspx.x_path=NIJZ%20podatkovni%20portal__1%20Zdravstveno%20stanje%20prebivalstva__03%20Porodi%20in%20rojstva&px_tableid=PIS_TB_4.px&px_language=sl&px_db=NIJZ%20podatkovni%20portal&rxid=d9527077-a453-41cd-ae6faeb8b0bbb6e8 [20. 7. 2019].
Poh, H.L., Koh, S.S., Seow, H.C. & He, H.G., 2013. First-time fathers' experiences and needs during pregnancy and childbirth: a descriptive qualitative study. Midwifery, 30(3), pp. 779–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.002 PMid: 24238935
Robinson, A., 2006. Phenomenology. In: E.R. Cluet & R. Bluff, eds. Principles and practice of research in midwifery. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, pp. 187−219.
Royal College of Midwives [RCM], 2018. Reaching out: involving fathers in maternity care. Available at: https://www.rcm.org.uk/sites/default/files/Father%27s%20Guides%20A4_3_0.pdf [28. 7. 2019]
Sapountzi-Krepia, D., Psychogiou, M., Sakellari, E., Tsiligiri, M. & Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K., 2015. Greek fathers' experiences from their wife's/partner's labour and delivery: a qualitative approach. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 21(5), pp. 470–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12326 PMid: 25307699
Smyth, S., Spence, D. & Murray, K., 2015. Does antenatal education prepare fathers for their role as birth partners and for parenthood. British Journal of Midwifery, 5(23), pp. 336–342. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2015.23.5.336
Steen, M., Downe, S., Bamford, N. & Edozien, L., 2012. Notpatient and not-visitor: a metasynthesis fathers' encounters with pregnancy, birth and maternity care. Midwifery, 28(4), pp. 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.06.009 PMid: 21820778
Švab, A., 2008. Novo očetovstvo v kontekstu družinskih sprememb. In: M. Ule, ed. Novo očetovstvo v Sloveniji. 1 izd. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani: Fakulteta za družbene vede, pp. 34–36.
Wagner, M., 2007. Evolucija k žensko osrediščeni obporodni skrbi. In: Z. Drglin, ed. Rojstna mašinerija: sodobne obporodne vednosti in prakse na Slovenskem. Koper: Univerza na Primorskem: Znanstveno-raziskovalno središče Koper: Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko: Založba Annales, pp. 17–19.
Whitehead, L., 2011. Qualitative data analysis. In: S. Jirojwong, M. Johnson & A. Welch, eds. Research methods in nursing & midwifery: pathways to evidence-based practice. Victoria: Oxford University Press, pp. 263–284.
World Medical Association, 2013. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of American Medical Association, 310(20), pp. 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 PMid:24141714
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
As the author undersigned hereby, I transfer, assign, or otherwise convey the following authorship rights as comprised in the Copyright and Related Rights Act (CRRA) to the Slovenian Nursing Review, Ob železnici 30A, 1000 Ljubljana: the right of reproduction - the exclusive right to fix the work in a material medium or in another copy directly or indirectly, temporarily or permanently, by any means and in any digital form, in whole or in part (CRRA, Article 23); the right of distribution (CRRA, Article 24); the right of making a work available and accessible through the internet (CRRA, Article 32a); the right of transformation, especially the exclusive right to translate a pre-existing work (CRRA, Article 33). The transfer of author rights applies to the article in its entirety, including pictorial and/or graphic works and possible supplements. The transfer of rights is exclusive and unlimited in duration or territory.
