The contribution of ethnography to understanding nursing work: a comparative review of three nursing ethnographies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2014.48.1.8Keywords:
participant observation, research methods, intensive care, gynaecology, medical admissionsAbstract
Introduction: This methods paper examines ways in which ethnography and in particular the ethnographic method of participant observation, informs understanding of the reality of nursing work.
Methods: The relevance of ethnography for nursing practice is illustrated through three ethnographic studies of nursing work, all of which involved participant observation for periods of over twelve months. These studies were conducted in three different hospital settings inWales,United Kingdom; an intensive therapy unit, a gynaecological unit and a medical admissions unit. Definitions of ethnography are considered along with an account of three key ethnographic methods; participant observation, interviews and documentary analysis.
Results: Two key themes which were apparent in all three of these ethnographies will be presented to demonstrate the contribution of ethnography in understanding nursing practice. These themes are; the embodied nature of nursing work and duality and tension in nursing work.
Discussion and conclusion: It will be argued that ethnography as a research approach enables nursing practice to be understood as it is actually experienced in the uncertain, disruptive and often resource limited context of contemporary healthcare.Downloads
Metrics
References
Allen, D., 2004. Re-reading nursing and re-writing practice: towards an empirically based reformulation of the nursing mandate. Nursing Inquiry, 11 (4), pp. 271-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2004.00234.x, PMid:15601415
Atkinson, P. & Hammersley, M., 1994. Ethnography and participant observation. In: Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. eds. Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage, pp. 248-259.
Brewer, J. 2000. Ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 11-26.
Brink, P. & Edgecombe, N., 2003. What is becoming of ethnography? Qualitative Health Research, 13 (2), pp. 1028-1030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732303253542, PMid:14502967
Delamont, S., 2007. Ethnography and participant observation. In: Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium J. & Silverman, D. eds. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage, pp. 205-217.
Geertz, C., 1993. The interpretation of cultures. London: Hutchinson, pp. 5-8.
Gerrish, K., 1997. Being a ‘marginal’ native: dilemmas of the participant observer. Nurse Researcher, 5 (1), pp. 25-34.
Gerrish, K., 2003. Self and others: the rigour and ethics of insider ethnography. In: Latimer, J. ed. Advanced qualitative research in nursing. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 77-94.
Gobo, G., 2008. Doing ethnography. Los Angeles: Sage, pp. 201-213.
Gold, R., 1958. Roles in sociological field observation. Social Forces, 36 (3), pp. 217-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2573808, Green, J. & Thorogood, N., 2013. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage, p. 23. PMCid:PMC3707789
Griffiths, P., 2011. A community of practice: the nurses’ role on a medical assessment unit . Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20 (1-2), pp. 247-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03135.x, PMid:20626529
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P., 2007. Ethnography: principles and practice. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 1-19.
Hammersley, M., 1992. What’s wrong with ethnography? London: Routledge, pp. 5-10.
Holloway, I. & Wheeler, S., 2010. Qualitative research in nursing. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science, p. 153.
Johnson, M., 2003. Research ethics and education: a consequentialist view. Nurse Education Today, 23 (3), pp. 165-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0260-6917(03)00017-0, PMid:12672383
Malinowski, B., 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge, p. 81.
Mason, J., 1996. Qualitative Researching. Sage: London.
Mason, J., 2002. Qualitative Researching. 2nd ed. Sage: London.
Murphy, F. & Merrell, J., 2009. Negotiating the transition: caring for women through the experience of early miscarriage. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18 (11), pp. 1583-1591.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02701.x, PMid:19490295
Nursing & Midwifery Council (NMC), 2008. Code of conduct. London: Nursing & Midwifery Council, pp. 2-10.
Philpin, S., 2007. Managing ambiguity and danger in an intensive therapy unit: ritual practices and sequestration. Nursing Inquiry, 14 (1), pp. 51-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2007.00354.x, PMid:17298608
Porter, S., 1995. Nursing’s relationship with medicine: a critical realist ethnography. Aldershot: Avebury.
Prior, L., 2003. Using documents in social research. London: Sage.
Savage, J., 1995. Nursing intimacy: an ethnographic approach to nurse-patient interaction. London: Scutari.
Savage, J., 2000. Participative observation: standing in the shoes of others? Qualitative Health Research, 10 (3), pp. 324-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104973200129118471, PMid:10947479
Smith, P., 1992. The emotional labour of nursing: how nurses care. London: Macmillan.
Street, A.F., 1992. Inside nursing: a critical ethnography of nursing practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Swanson, K.M., 1991. Empirical development of a middle range theory of caring. Nursing Research, 40 (3), pp. 161-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199105000-00008, PMid:2030995
Swanson, K.M., 1999. Research-based practice with women who have had miscarriages. Image Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 31 (4), pp. 339-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1999.tb00514.x, PMid:10628100
Walsh, D., 1998. Doing ethnography. In: Seale, C. ed. Researching society and culture. London: Sage, pp. 217232.
Watson, J., 1988. Human science and human care: a theory of nursing. New York: National League for Nursing.
Wilkins, R., 1993. Taking it personally: a note on emotion and autobiography. Sociology, 27 (1), pp. 93-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003803859302700109
Wolf, Z.R., 1988. Nurse’s work, the sacred and the profane. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
As the author undersigned hereby, I transfer, assign, or otherwise convey the following authorship rights as comprised in the Copyright and Related Rights Act (CRRA) to the Slovenian Nursing Review, Ob železnici 30A, 1000 Ljubljana: the right of reproduction - the exclusive right to fix the work in a material medium or in another copy directly or indirectly, temporarily or permanently, by any means and in any digital form, in whole or in part (CRRA, Article 23); the right of distribution (CRRA, Article 24); the right of making a work available and accessible through the internet (CRRA, Article 32a); the right of transformation, especially the exclusive right to translate a pre-existing work (CRRA, Article 33). The transfer of author rights applies to the article in its entirety, including pictorial and/or graphic works and possible supplements. The transfer of rights is exclusive and unlimited in duration or territory.
