Sooblikovanje porodne izkušnje na podlagi reprezentacije poroda v množičnih medijih
pregled literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2025.59.2.3282Ključne besede:
nosečnost, rojstvo, javna podoba, množični medijiPovzetek
Uvod: Množični mediji so redek vir porodnih reprezentacij, ki ženskam pomagajo razumeti, kako je roditi, obenem pa povzročajo zaskrbljenost. Namen raziskave je proučiti prikaze poroda v množičnih medijih, cilj pa prepoznati njihovo povezavo s porodnimi izkušnjami žensk.
Metode: Opravljen je bil pregled literature, objavljene v bibliografskih bazah DiKUL, EBSCO Information Services, Google Scholar, ProQuest, PubMed, ResearchGate, ScienceDirect in SpringerLink po iskalnih nizih v slovenskem in angleškem jeziku. Vključitveni kriteriji so bili objava v obdobju 2012‒2022 ter vsebinska ustreznost in relevantnost. Potek izbora literature je bil narejen po smernicah PRISMA. Med 349 zadetki smo po izključitvi dvojnikov ter na podlagi vključitvenih kriterijev in relevantnosti vsebine v podrobnejšo analizo vključili 26 znanstvenih virov.
Rezultati: Porodne reprezentacije v množičnih medijih so lahko pristranske in ne temeljijo vedno na dokazih. Prisotni do obrabljeni in predvidljivi vzorci s prevladujočim dramatičnim prikazom biomedicinskega modela poroda, kar v porodnicah vzbuja strah in željo poroda s carskim rezom.
Diskusija in zaključek: Reprezentacije poroda v množičnih medijih postavljajo normativ medikaliziranega poroda, alternativne možnosti so prikazane redko in nejasno, na kar lahko pomembno vpliva sodelovanje medijskih producentov in babiške stroke. Znanstvenih člankov o reprezentacijah poroda v slovenskem prostoru primanjkuje, kar odpira priložnost za raziskovanje v prihodnosti in možnost za nadaljnje izpopolnjevanje babiške stroke ter predporodne in obporodne oskrbe porodnic.
Prenosi
Metrike
Literatura
Adams, D. M. & Hamm, M. (2001). Literacy in a multimedia age. Christopher-Gordon Pub.
Al-Gailani, S. (2017). Drawing aside the curtain: Natural childbirth on screen in 1950s Britain. British Journal for the History of Science, 50(3), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087417000607 PMid:28923126; PMCid:PMC5963435
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Bessett, D., & Murawsky, S. (2018). I guess I do have to take back what I said before, about television: Pregnant women’s understandings and use of televisual representations of childbearing. Sociology of Health and Illness, 40(3), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12658 PMid:29274085
Bliss, L. (2020). The maternal imagination of film and film theory. In The Maternal Imagination of Film and Film Theory. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45897-3
Booth, A., Sutton, A., Clowes, M., & Martyn-St James, M. (2022). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (3rd ed.). Sage.
Cooper, T., & Godfrey-Isaacs, L. (2019). Gathering storm-birth in the media. In K. Gutteridge (Ed.), Understanding anxiety, worry and fear in childbearing: A resource for midwives and clinicians (pp. 75–95). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21063-2_5
Das, R. (2018). Mediated subjectivities of the maternal: A critique of childbirth videos on YouTube. The Communication Review, 21(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2017.1416807
De Benedictis, S., Johnson, C., Roberts, J., & Spiby, H. (2019). Quantitative insights into televised birth: A content analysis of one born every minute. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 36(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2018.1516046 PMid:30881228; PMCid:PMC6398118
Donnison, J. (1977). Midwives and medical men: A history of inter-professional rivalries and women’s rights. Heinemann Educational. https://wellcomecollection.org/works/zyeuxyyd
Fleming, S. E., Vandermause, R., & Shaw, M. (2014). First-time mothers preparing for birthing in an electronic world: Internet and obile phone technology. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 32(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2014.886104
Fontein-Kuipers, Y., van Duijvenbode, J., & Pluymaekers, M. (2019). Portrayal of shared decision-making in lifetime documentary series ‘One born every minute.’ SM Journal of Nursing, 5(1), Article 1021. https://www.jsmcentral.org/article-info/Portrayal-of-Shared-Decision-Making-in-Lifetime-Documentary-Series-One-Born-Every-Minute
Gagnon, R. (2021). A longitudinal study of women’s representations and experiences of pregnancy and childbirth. Midwifery, 103, Article 103101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.103101 PMid:34352599
Haines, H. M., Rubertsson, C., Pallant, J. F., & Hildingsson, I. (2012). The influence of women’s fear, attitudes and beliefs of childbirth on mode and experience of birth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 12(1), Article 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-55/TABLES/7 PMid:22727217
Handfield, B., Turnbull, S., & Bell, R. J. (2006). What do obstetricians think about media influences on their patients. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 46(5), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00621.x PMid:16953850
Hassan, R. & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2006). The New Media Theory Reader. Open University Press. Hauck, Y. L., Stoll, K. H., Hall, W. A., & Downie, J. (2016). Association between childbirth attitudes and fear on birth preferences of a future generation of Australian parents. Women and Birth, 29(6), 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.05.001 PMid:27233945
Hundley, V., Luce, A., van Teijlingen, E., & Edlund, S. (2019). Changing the narrative around childbirth. Evidence Based Midwifery, 17(2), 47–52. Jolly, N. (2018). Sexy birth: Breaking Hollywood’s last taboo. Sexualities, 21(3), 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717699770
Luce, A., Cash, M., Hundley, V., Cheyne, H., Van Teijlingen, E., & Angell, C. (2016). Is it realistic: The portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(1), Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0827-x PMid:26928660; PMCid:PMC4770672
Maclean, E. (2014). What to expect when you’re expecting: Representations of birth in British newspapers. British Journal of Midwifery, 22(8), 580–588.
Miller, Y. D., & Danoy-Monet, M. (2021). Reproducing fear: The effect of birth stories on nulligravid women’s birth preferences. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21(1), Article 451. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03944-w PMid:34182948; PMCid:PMC8240297
Morris, T., & McInerney, K. (2010). Media representations of pregnancy and childbirth: An analysis of reality television programs in the United States. Birth, 37(2), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1523-536X.2010.00393.X PMid:20557536
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, Article 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSU.2021.105906 PMid:33789826
Pincus, J. (2010). Laboring under an illusion: Mass media childbirth vs. the real thing. Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care, 37(1), 82–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1523-536X.2009.00384_2.X
Potter, W. J. (2010). The State of Media Literacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(4), 675–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.521462
Ribak, R., & Leshnick, A. (2022). A powerful, spiritual, winwin situation: Commercial authenticity in professional birth photography. Media, Culture and Society, 44(5), 951–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211060237
Roberts, J., Bennett, B., Slack, H., Borrelli, S., Spiby, H., Walker, L., & Jomeen, J. (2021). Midwifery students’ views and experiences of birth on mainstream factual television. Midwifery, 92, Article 451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102859 PMid:33129184
Roberts, J. & De Benedictis, S. (2021). Childbirth on television: A scoping review and recommendations for further research. Feminist Media Studies, 21(2), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1690025
Roberts, J., De Benedictis, S., & Spiby, H. (2017). Love Birth, hate one born every minute: Birth community discourse around televised childbirth. Midwifery, Childbirth and the Media, 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63513-2_2
Roland, E., Teijlingen, V., & Luce, A. (2015). Do midwives need to be more media savvy? MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, 25(1), 5–10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331167758
Romano, A. M., Lythgoe, A., & Goer, H. (2010). They said so on the news: Parsing media reports about birth. Journal of perinatal Education, 19(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1624/105812410x481555 PMid:20174490; PMCid:PMC2820358
Rudd, R. (2003). Improvement of health literacy. In Communicating health: Priorities and strategies for progress (pp. 35–61). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Sanders, J. (2019). Sharing special birth stories: An explorative study of online childbirth narratives. Women and Birth, 32(6), 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.12.009 PMid:30591304
Stoll, K., Edmonds, J. K., & Hall, W. A. (2015). Fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean delivery among young American women before childbirth: A survey study. Birth, 42(3), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12178 PMid:26104997
Stoll, K., & Hall, W. (2013). Vicarious birth experiences and childbirth fear: Does it matter how young Canadian women learn about birth. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 22(4), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.22.4.226 PMid:24868135; PMCid:PMC4010856
Stoll, K., Hall, W., Janssen, P., & Carty, E. (2014). Why are young Canadians afraid of birth: A survey study of childbirth fear and birth preferences among Canadian University students. Midwifery, 30(2), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.07.017 PMid:23968778; PMCid:PMC4010856
Takeshita, C. (2017). Countering technocracy: “natural” birth in The Business of Being Born and Call the Midwife. Feminist Media Studies, 17(3), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1283341
Tyler, I., & Baraitser, L. (2013). Private view, public birth: Making feminist sense of the new visual culture of childbirth. Studies in the Maternal, 5(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.16995/SIM.18
Uppal, E., Davies, S., Nuttall, J., & Knowles, H. (2016). Exploring undisturbed birth through art and social media An interactive project with student midwives. British Journal of Midwifery, 24(2), 124–129.
Vitek, K., & Ward, L. M. (2019). Risky, dramatic, and unrealistic: Reality television portrayals of pregnancy and childbirth and their effects on women’s fear and self-efficacy. Health Communication, 34(11), 1289–1295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1481708 PMid:29869897
Yam, S.-y. S. (2019). Birth images on Instagram: The disruptive visuality of birthing bodies. Women’s Studies in Communication, 42(1), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2018.1561564
Young, D. (2010). Childbirth education, the internet, and reality television: Challenges ahead. Birth, 37(2), 87–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1523-536X.2010.00398.X PMid:20557530
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2025 Obzornik zdravstvene nege

To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Na Obzornik zdravstvene nege, Ob železnici 30A, 1000 Ljubljana, prenašam naslednje materialne avtorske pravice: pravico reproduciranja v neomejeni količini, in sicer v vseh poznanih oblikah reproduciranja, kar obsega tudi pravico shranitve in reproduciranja v kakršnikoli elektronski obliki (23. čl. Zakona o avtorski in sorodnih pravicah – v nadaljevanju ZASP); pravico distribuiranja (24. čl. ZASP); pravico dajanja na voljo javnosti vključno z dajanjem na voljo javnosti prek svetovnega spleta oz. računalniške mreže (32.a čl. ZASP); pravico predelave, zlasti za namen prevoda (33. čl. ZASP). Prenos pravic velja za članek v celoti (vključno s slikami, razpredelnicami in morebitnimi prilogami). Prenos je izključen ter prostorsko in časovno neomejen.