Understanding intergenerational characteristics of nurses in clinical practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2025.59.1.3288Keywords:
nursing, working environment, intergenerational cooperation, quality, satisfactionAbstract
Introduction: In the context of globally changing and multigenerational work environments, understanding generational differences is crucial for reducing conflict and improving collaboration in nursing care. The aim of this study was to explore the intergenerational characteristics of nurses in clinical practice.
Methods: In this non-experimental, descriptive, quantitative study, a translated version of the Multidimensional Nursing Generations Questionnaire was used to assess generational differences in nursing. A convenience sample of 100 nurses working in the clinical setting was surveyed. A total of 91 respondents (91%) were women and 9 (9%) were men. The data were analysed using basic descriptive statistics and non-parametric statistical tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results: The results of the study indicate good coordination and collaboration between individual generations of respondents, a high degree of openness to change, autonomy and confidence in decision-making, and a positive attitude towards work (p < 0.001). Higher scores were reported by Generation X employees, men, employees with a master's degree, and primary care employees. However, the results show no statistically significant differences between the groups in the assessment of knowledge of intergenerational characteristics among nurses (p > 0.05).
Discussion and conclusion: Our results indicate good intergenerational interaction and coordination among nursing professionals. The study contributes to a better understanding of the dynamics of intergenerational collaboration in nursing, which has the potential to improve working relationships and the quality of care.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ali Alferjany, M., & Alias, R. (2021). Generational differences in values and attitudes within workplace. Psychology, 57, 1496–1503. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348930412
Anselmo-Witzel, S., Orshan, S. A., Heitner, K. L., & Bachand,J. (2017). Are generation Y nurses satisfied on the job: Understanding their lived experiences. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 47(4), 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0000000000000470 PMid:28333792
Batista, M., Cardoso, M., Martins, P., Lucas, P., Potra, T., Hospitalar, C., Montijo, B., & Barreiro. (2022). The involvement in the work of nurses from different generations in a hospital. Global Academic Nursing Journal, 3, Article e213. https://doi.org/10.5935/2675-5602.20200213
Behling, O., & Law, K. (2000). Translating questionnaires and other research instruments. Thousand Oaks California: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986373
Berkup, S. B. (2014). Working with generations X and Y in generation Z period: Management of different generations in business life. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19), Article 21. http://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n19p218
Choi, P. P., Wong, S. S., Lee, W. M., & Tiu, M. H. (2022). Multigenerational perspectives on the competencies required of first-line nurse managers: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), Article 10560. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710560 PMid:36078279; PMCid:PMC9518487
Coburn, A. S., & Hall, S. J. (2014). Generational differences in nurses' characteristics, job satisfaction, quality of work life, and psychological empowerment. Journal of Hospital Administration, 3(5), Article124. https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v3n5p124
Cardillo D. (2013, March). Closing the generation gap in nursing. Donna Cardillo: The inspiration nurse. https://donnacardillo.com/articles/generationgap/
Eycan, O., & Ulupinar, S. (2023). Professional attitude and selfrespect of generation X and Y nurses. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 14(2), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.14744/phd.2022.49344
Field, A. P. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE Publications. Gordon, P. A. (2017). Exploring generational cohort work satisfaction in hospital nurses. Leadership in Health Services, 30(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHS-02-2016-0008 PMid:28693396
Grbič, A. (2023). Izzivi medgeneracijskega vodenja v zdravstveni negi. A. Istenič (Ed.), Dimenzije kakovosti invarnosti v onkološki zdravstveni negi: 47. strokovni seminar (pp. 21–33). Zbornica zdravstvene in babiške nege – Zveza strokovnih društev medicinskih sester, babic in zdravstvenih tehnikov Slovenije, Sekcija medicinskih sester in zdravstvenih tehnikov v onkologiji. https://dirros.openscience.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=16722
Hendricks, J. M., & Cope, V. C. (2013). Generational diversity: What nurse managers need to know. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(3), 717–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06079.x PMid:22775766
Janežič, D. (2022). Pregled značilnosti in analiza razlik med generacijskimi skupinami. Challenges of the Future, 7(1), 48–74. https://doi.org/10.37886/ip.2022.003
Kavšak, A., & Prosen, M. (2021). Vpliv zadovoljstva z delom na pojav izgorelosti med medicinskimi sestrami: kvalitativna opisna raziskava. Obzornik zdravstvene nege, 55(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2021.55.1.3018
Kodeks etike v zdravstveni negi in oskrbi Slovenije in Kodeks etike za babice Slovenije. (2014). Zbornica zdravstvene in babiške nege Slovenije – Zveza strokovnih društev medicinskih sester, babic in zdravstvenih tehnikov Slovenije.
Lorber, M. (2018). A healthy work environment: Care for the well-being and health of employees in nursing. Obzornik zdravstvene nege, 52(3), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2018.52.3.851
Lorber, M., Treven, S., & Mumel, D. (2015). The importance of monitoring nurses' workplace satisfaction of nurses for the well-being of all employees in nursing. Obzornik zdravstvene nege, 49(3), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2015.49.3.73
Nacionalni inštitut za javno zdravje [NIJZ]. (2021). Prva objava: izvajalci zdravstvene dejavnosti 2020. https://nijz.si/podatki/prvaobjava-izvajalci-zdravacionalni inštitustvene-dejavnosti-2020/
Rollan Oliveira, S., & Siles Gonzalez, J. (2021). Nursing professionals within the intergenerational context during the 20th and 21st Centuries: An integrative review. Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria, 39(3), Article e14. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v39n3e14 PMid:34822241; PMCid:PMC8912162
So Hee, L., & Yeojin, Y. (2023). Work values and communication styles among generation X, Y, and Z nurses: A cross-sectional study. International Nursing Review, 71(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12863 PMid:37449528
Stevanin, S., Bressan, V., Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K., Pagani, L., Poletti, P., & Kvist, T. (2017). The multidimensional nursing generations questionnaire: development, reliability, and validity assessments. Journal of Nursing Management, 25(4), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12465 PMid:28164399
Stevanin, S., Palese, A., Bressan, V., Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K., & Kvist, T. (2018). Workplace-related generational characteristics of nurses: A mixed-method systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(6), 1245–1263. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13538 PMid:29424038
Stevanin, S., Voutilainen, A., Bressan, V., Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K., Rosolen, V., & Kvist, T. (2020). Nurses' generational differences related to workplace and leadership in two European countries. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 42(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919838604 PMid:30943872
Šanc, P., & Prosen, M. (2022). Medpoklicno sodelovanje v interdisciplinarnih zdravstvenih timih: kvantitativna opisna raziskava. Obzornik zdravstvene nege, 56(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2022.56.1.3106
Tan, S. H. E., & Chin, G. F. (2023). Generational effect on nurses' work values, engagement, and satisfaction in an acute hospital. BMC Nursing, 22(1), Article 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01256-2 PMid:36997911; PMCid:PMC10061355
Yeasmin, S., & Rahman, K. F. (2012). Triangulation research method as the tool of social science research. BUP journal, 1(1), 154–163.
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 PMid:24141714
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Slovenian Nursing Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As the author undersigned hereby, I transfer, assign, or otherwise convey the following authorship rights as comprised in the Copyright and Related Rights Act (CRRA) to the Slovenian Nursing Review, Ob železnici 30A, 1000 Ljubljana: the right of reproduction - the exclusive right to fix the work in a material medium or in another copy directly or indirectly, temporarily or permanently, by any means and in any digital form, in whole or in part (CRRA, Article 23); the right of distribution (CRRA, Article 24); the right of making a work available and accessible through the internet (CRRA, Article 32a); the right of transformation, especially the exclusive right to translate a pre-existing work (CRRA, Article 33). The transfer of author rights applies to the article in its entirety, including pictorial and/or graphic works and possible supplements. The transfer of rights is exclusive and unlimited in duration or territory.
