Qualitative analysis of factors associated with the experience of contraception in rural setting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2016.50.2.85Keywords:
society, family planning, health literacy, quality of life, phenomenologyAbstract
Introduction: The phenomenon of contraception, its prevalence and its implication for women's emancipation is influenced by a number of social factors, including the environment. The purpose of this study was to examine the phenomenon of contraception through the eyes, knowledge, experience and perception of women living in rural areas. Methods: The phenomenological approach was used within the framework of qualitative methodology. The purposive sample included eight women aged 20 to 50 years, living in the rural areas of western Slovenia. The research was conducted in April and May 2015. The data obtained through semi-structured interviews were analysed using the method of phenomenological text analysis. Results: The analysis yielded four thematic groups which conceptualize the studied phenomenon: (1) the factors affecting the choice and use of a contraceptive method and its acceptance, (2) the importance of contraception for women, (3) the education and acquisition of adequate contraceptive knowledge, (4) the women's social status. Discussion and conclusion: Results of the research indicate that contraception is an important dimension of women's quality of life and their social status. The acceptance of contraception and the selection of a contraceptive method are influenced by a number of social factors and guided by various support systems. The knowledge of these factors enables nurses to systematically plan and deliver health education. Further research of the phenomenon could be conducted also among urban female population.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Anurin, V.F., 2002. The sexual revolution. Sociological Research, 41(2), pp. 61−75. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/sor1061-0154410261
Benagiano, G., Bastianelli, C. & Farris, M., 2007. Contraception: a social revolution. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 12(1), pp. 3−12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13625180601012311 PMid:17455038
Boh, K., 1975. Socialno psihološki faktorji v načrtovanju družine. Ljubljana: Inštitut za sociologijo in filozofijo pri Univerzi v Ljubljani. Available at: http://www.adp.fdv.uni-lj.si/podatki/spfnd75/spfnd75-om1.pdf [27. 4. 2016].
British Sociological Association, 2002. Statement of ethical practice for the British Sociological Association. Available at: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/about/equality/statement-of-ethical-practice.aspx [26. 7. 2013].
Cook, H., 2004. Long sexual revolution: women, sex, and contraception, 1800-1975. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 11−80.
DiCicco-Bloom, B. & Crabtree B.F., 2006. The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), pp. 314−321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x PMid:16573666
Evans, M.L., 2009. A desire to control: contraception throughout the ages. Historia Medicinae, 1(1), p. E08. Available at: http://www.medicinae.org/e08 [27. 4. 2016].
Garner, A.C. & Mendez, E., 2016. The never-ending struggle: US press coverage of contraception 2000–2013. Journalism, 17(3), pp. 382–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464884914558912
Gibson, W.J. & Brown A., 2009. Working with qualitative data. London: Sage, pp. 116−120.
Giddens, A., 2000. Preobrazba intimnosti: spolnost, ljubezen in erotika v sodobnih družbah. Ljubljana: Založba /*cf, pp. 34, 175.
Glasier, A., 2002. Contraception - past and future. Nature Cell Biology, 4(Suppl. 1), pp. S3−S6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb-nm-fertilitys3 PMid:12479606
Gordon, L., 2002. Moral property of women: a history of birth control politics in America. 3rd ed.. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, pp. 7−21.
Jain, A., 2003. Religion, state, and population growth. In: Maguire, D.C. ed. Sacred rights: the case for contraception and abortion in world religions. Cary: Oxford University Press, pp. 237−254.
Kvale, S., 2007. Doing interviews. London: Sage, p. 10.
Lowe, P., 2005. Contraception and heterosex: an intimate relationship. Sexualities, 8(1), pp. 75–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1363460705049575
Lupton, D., 2003. Medicine as culture: illness, disease and the body in Western societies. London: Sage, pp. 149−152.
Maguire, D.C., 2003. Introduction. In: Maguire, D.C. ed. Sacred rights: the case for contraception and abortion in world religions. Cary: Oxford University Press, pp. 3−20.
Mason, M., 2010. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 11(3), p. 8. Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428/3027 [21. 3. 2016].
Miklavčič, M., 2014. Ogenj, rit in kače niso za igrače. Žiri: Jutri, pp. 5−91.
Nacionalni inštitut za javno zdravje Republike Slovenije, 2014. 26. september 2014: Svetovni dan kontracepcije. Available at: http://www.nijz.si/sl/26-september-2014-svetovni-dan-kontracepcije [5. 12. 2015].
Oliveira da Silva, M., Albrecht J., Olsen J., Karro H., Temmerman M., Gissler M., et al., 2011. The reproductive health report: the state of sexual and reproductive health within the European Union. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 16(Suppl. 1), pp. S1−S70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2011.607690 PMid:21892901
Pahor, M., 2007. Kako (in zakaj) raziskati doživljanje rojevanja: od empirije do teorije rojevanja. In: Drglin, Z. ed. Rojstna mašinerija: sodobne obporodne vednosti in prakse na Slovenskem. Koper: Univerza na Primorskem, Znanstveno-raziskovalno središče, Založba Annales, Zgodovinsko društvo za južno Primorsko, pp. 49−72.
Pinter, B. &, Grebenc, M., 2010. Rodnost in dovoljena splavnost mladostnic v Sloveniji. Zdravniški vestnik, 79(9), pp. 609−617.
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, 2012. A history of birth control methods. Available at:
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/2613/9611/6275/History_of_BC_Methods.pdf [27. 4. 2016].
Prescott, H.M., 2011. The morning after: a history of emergency contraception in the United States. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, pp. 7−21.
Riessman, C.K., 1983. Women and medicalization: a new perspective. Social Policy, 14(1), pp. 3–18. PMid:10264493
Robinson, A., 2006. Phenomenology. In: Cluet E.R. & Bluff, R. eds. Principles and practice of research in midwifery. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, pp. 187−219.
Scott, A., 2013. The practice nurse's role in contraception choice. Primary Health Care, 23(6), pp. 16−22. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/phc2013.07.23.6.16.e713
Sonfield, A., Hasstedt, K., Kavanaugh, M.L. & Anderson, R., 2013. The social and economic benefits of women's ability to determine whether and when to have children. New York: Guttmacher Institute. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/social-economic-benefits.pdf [27. 4. 2016].
Stankuniene, V. & Maslauskaite, A., 2008. Family transformations in the post-communist countries: attitudes toward changes. In: Höhn, C., Avramov, D. & Kotowska, I. eds. People, population change and policies. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.113−138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6609-2_6
te Velde, E.R., 2011. Is women's emancipation still compatible with motherhood in western societies? In: Beets, G., Schippers, J. & te Velde, E.R. eds. The future of motherhood in western societies. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 5−15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8969-4
Tone, A., 2002. Making room for rubbers: gender, technology, and birth control before the pill. History and Technology, 18(1), pp. 51−76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07341510290028756
Tone, A., 2012. Medicalizing reproduction: the pill and home pregnancy tests. Journal of Sex Research, 49(4), pp. 319−327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.688226 PMid:22720823
Ule, M. & Kuhar, M., 2003. Mladi, družina, starševstvo: spremembe življenjskih potekov v pozni moderni. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede, p. 60.
United Nations, 2013. World contraceptive patterns 2013. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/family/worldContraceptivePatternsWallChart2013.pdf [4. 12. 2015].
Wigginton, B., Harris M.L., Loxton, D., Herbert, D. & Lucke, J., 2015. The feminisation of contraceptive use: Australian women's accounts of accessing contraception. Feminism & Psychology, 25(2), pp. 178−198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959353514562802
World Health Organization, 2016. Research policy. Available at: http://www.who.int/rpc/research_ethics/informed_consent/en/ [17. 5. 2016].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
As the author undersigned hereby, I transfer, assign, or otherwise convey the following authorship rights as comprised in the Copyright and Related Rights Act (CRRA) to the Slovenian Nursing Review, Ob železnici 30A, 1000 Ljubljana: the right of reproduction - the exclusive right to fix the work in a material medium or in another copy directly or indirectly, temporarily or permanently, by any means and in any digital form, in whole or in part (CRRA, Article 23); the right of distribution (CRRA, Article 24); the right of making a work available and accessible through the internet (CRRA, Article 32a); the right of transformation, especially the exclusive right to translate a pre-existing work (CRRA, Article 33). The transfer of author rights applies to the article in its entirety, including pictorial and/or graphic works and possible supplements. The transfer of rights is exclusive and unlimited in duration or territory.
