Priložnosti na področju trajnostnega razvoja gastrointestinalnih endoskopij
sistematični pregled literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2026.60.2.3284Ključne besede:
zelena endoskopija, ogljični odtis, okoljski vplivPovzetek
Uvod: Trajnostni razvoj in prizadevanje za zmanjšanje ogljičnega odtisa v vseh fazah procesa gastrointestinalnih endoskopij sta vplivala na pojav koncepta »zelene endoskopije«. Namen raziskave je preučiti trajnostne strategije v gastrointestinalni endoskopiji in njihovo učinkovitost pri zmanjševanju okoljskega vpliva brez ogrožanja kakovosti zdravstvene obravnave.
Metode: Izveden je bil sistematični pregled znanstvene literature. Iskanje je potekalo v podatkovnih bazah PubMed in ScienceDirect, prek platform ClinicalKey in Wiley Online Library ter spletnega iskalnika Google Scholar. Iskali smo po ključnih besedah v angleščini: green endoscopy, carbon footprint, environmental impact; v slovenščini: zelena endoskopija, ogljični odtis, okoljski vpliv. Vključeni so bili članki, objavljeni med letoma 2018 in 2023, dostopni v slovenskem ali angleškem jeziku in s celotnim besedilom. Podatki so bili obdelani s tematsko kvalitativno analizo.
Rezultati: V končno analizo je bilo vključenih 15 virov. Oblikovanih je bilo pet vsebinskih kategorij: varovanje okolja, oprema in pripomočki, opolnomočenje pacientov, opolnomočenje zaposlenih ter varnost pacientov. Zmanjšanje okoljskega bremena je izvedljivo, vendar le ob sistemskem in večdimenzionalnem pristopu, ki presega zgolj tehnične prilagoditve. Klinična učinkovitost ob tem ni ogrožena, kadar so trajnostni ukrepi implementirani skladno z veljavnimi smernicami in standardi varnosti.
Diskusija in zaključek: Kvalitativna tematska analiza je pokazala, da mora predvsem vodstvo zdravstvenih organizacij in posameznih endoskopskih enot sprejeti hitre in učinkovite ukrepe s ciljem zmanjševanja onesnaženja okolja in sledenja načrtu trajnostnega razvoja. Ob upoštevanju strokovnih smernic je mogoče zmanjševati okoljski odtis ob ohranjanju kakovosti zdravstvene obravnave. Potrebne so nadaljnje empirične raziskave za natančnejšo kvantifikacijo ogljičnega odtisa v posameznih fazah endoskopskega procesa.
Prenosi
Literatura
Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., & Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed., pp. 149–152). SAGE Publications.
Cunha Neves, J. A., Roseira, J., Queirós, P., Sousa, H. T., Pellino, G., & Cunha, M. F. (2022). Targeted intervention to achieve waste reduction in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut, 72(2), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327005 PMid:35985798
de Jong, D., Volkers, A., de Ridder, E., Neijenhuis, M., & Duijvestein, M. (2023). Steps toward a greener endoscopy unit. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 21, 2723–2726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2023.06.007 PMid:37330119
de Melo, S. W., Taylor, G. L., & Kao, J. Y. (2021). Packaging and waste in the endoscopy suite. Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 23(4), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tige.2021.07.004
Desai, M., Campbell, C., Perisetti, A., Srinivasan, S., Radadiya, D., Patel, H., Melquist, S., Rex, D. K., & Sharma, P. (2023). The environmental impact of gastrointestinal procedures: A prospective study of waste generation, energy consumption, and auditing in an endoscopy unit. Gastroenterology, 166(3), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2023.12.006 PMid:38123023
Duijvestein, M., Sidhu, R., Zimmermann, K., Carrington, E. V., Hann, A., Sousa, P., Touw, H. R. W., van Hooft, J. E., & Müller, M. (2024). The United European Gastroenterology green paper—climate change and gastroenterology. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 12(9), 1292–1305. https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12698 PMid:39452615; PMCid:PMC11578853
Gayam, S. (2020). Environmental impact of endoscopy: "Scope" of the problem. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 115(12), 1931–1932. https://doi.org/10.14309/AJG.0000000000001005 PMid:33086225
Hernandez, L. V., Agrawal, D., Skole, K. S., Crockett, S. D., Shimpi, R. A., von Renteln, D., & Pohl, H. (2023). Meeting the environmental challenges of endoscopy: A pathway from strategy to implementation. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 98(6), 881–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2023.07.031 PMid:37977670
Lacroute, J., Marcantoni, J., Petitot, S., Weber, J., Levy, P., Dirrenberger, B., Tchoumak, I., Baron, M., Gibert, S., Marguerite, S., Huppertz, J., Gronier, O., & Derlon, A. (2023). The carbon footprint of ambulatory gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy, 55(10), 918–926. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2088-4062 PMid:37156511
Lenzen, M., Malik, A., Li, M., Fry, J., Weisz, H., Pichler, P. P., Chaves, L. S. M., Capon, A., & Pencheon, D. (2020). The environmental footprint of health care: A global assessment. The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(7), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30121-2 PMid:32681898
Maida, M., Vitello, A., Shahini, E., Vassallo, R., Sinagra, E., Pallio, S., Melita, G., Ramai, D., Spadaccini, M., Hassan, C., & Facciorusso, A. (2024). Green endoscopy, one step toward a sustainable future: Literature review. Endoscopy International Open, 12(8), Article a23038621. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2303-8621 PMid:39184060; PMCid:PMC11343619
Martin-Cabezuelo, R., Vilariño-Feltrer, G., Campillo-Fernández, A. J., Lorenzo-Zúñiga, V., Pons, V., López-Muñoz, P., & Tort-Ausina, I. (2023). Materials science toolkit for carbon footprint assessment: A case study for endoscopic accessories of common use. ACS Environmental Au, 4(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.3c00044 PMid:38250342; PMCid:PMC10797683
Maurice, J. B., Siau, K., Sebastian, S., Ahuja, N., Wesley, E., Stableforth, W., & Hayee, B. (2020). Green Endoscopy Network. Green endoscopy: A call for sustainability in the midst of COVID-19. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 5(7), 636–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30157-6 PMid:32553141; PMCid:PMC7295492
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Menini, M., Crisciotti, C., Hassan, C., Rizkala, T., Di Stefano, L., Spadaccini, M., Fumagalli, A., Fugazza, A., Vanni, E., Oliva, P., Iacovino, R., Giordano, S., & Repici, A. (2026). Reducing the environmental impact of gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective study on waste management through waste segregation and staff education. Endoscopy, 58(1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2661-1820 PMid:40829623
Namburar, S., von Renteln, D., Damianos, J., Bradish, L., Barrett, J., Aguilera-Fish, A., Cushman-Roisin, B., & Pohl, H. (2022). Estimating the environmental impact of disposable endoscopic equipment and endoscopes. Gut, 71(7), 1326–1331. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324729 PMid:34853058
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 PMid:33782057; PMCid:PMC8005924
Park, S. B., & Cha, J. M. (2023). Gastrointestinal endoscopy's carbon footprint. Clinical Endoscopy, 56(3), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.003 PMid:36997185; PMCid:PMC10244153
Perisetti, A., Desai, M., Bourke, M. J., Penman, I., Repici, A., Reddy, D. N., Tajiri, H., Rex, D. K., Hassan, C., & Sharma, P. (2023). Production and possible reduction of greenhouse gases produced during GI endoscopy activity: A systematic review of available literature. Gut, 72(3), 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328369 PMid:36522150
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health.
Rao, A., Sultany, A., Gondal, A., Chakinala, R. C., Bharadwaj, H. R., Chandan, S., Ali, H., Malik, S., Alsakarneh, S., & Dahiya, D. S. (2025). Green endoscopy: A review of global perspectives on environmental sustainability of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(11), Article 3936. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113936 PMid:40507697; PMCid:PMC12156243
Rodriguez de Santiago, E., Dinis-Ribeiro, M., Pohl, H., Agrawal, D., Arvanitakis, M., Baddeley, R., Bak, E., Bhandari, P., Bretthauer, M., Burga, P., Donnelly, L., Eickhoff, A., Hayee, B., Kaminski, M. F., Karlović, K., Lorenzo-Zúñiga, V., Pellisé, M., Pioche, M., Siau, K., ... Messmann, H. (2022). Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) position statement. Endoscopy, 54(8), 797–826. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1859-3726 PMid:35803275
Ryu, K., Yoon, W. J., Kim, S. H., Park, D. H., Park, J. H., Bang, K. B., Jeon, T. J., Jung, D. H., & Cho, Y. S. (2025). Current status and trends of green endoscopy. Clinical Endoscopy, 58(4), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2024.332 PMid:40394928; PMCid:PMC12314607
Sebastian, S., Dhar, A., Baddeley, R., Donnelly, L., Haddock, R., Arasaradnam, R., Coulter, A., Disney, B. R., Griffiths, H., Healey, C., Hillson, R., Steinbach, I., Marshall, S., Rajendran, A., Rochford, A., Thomas-Gibson, S., Siddhi, S., Stableforth, W., Wesley, E., ... Hayee, B. (2022). Green endoscopy: British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), Joint Accreditation Group (JAG) and Centre for Sustainable Healthcare (CSH) joint consensus on practical measures for environmental sustainability in endoscopy. Gut, 72(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328460
Siau, K., Hayee, B. H., & Gayam, S. (2021). Endoscopy's current carbon footprint. Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 23(4), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tige.2021.06.005
Siddhi, S., Dhar, A., & Sebastian, S. (2021). Best practices in environmental advocacy and research in endoscopy. Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 23(4), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tige.2021.06.002
Vaccari, M., Tudor, T., & Perteghella, A. (2018). Costs associated with the management of waste from healthcare facilities: An analysis at national and site level. Waste Management & Research, 36(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X17739968 PMid:29132259
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2026 Obzornik zdravstvene nege
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno-Brez predelav 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Na Obzornik zdravstvene nege, Ob železnici 30A, 1000 Ljubljana, prenašam naslednje materialne avtorske pravice: pravico reproduciranja v neomejeni količini, in sicer v vseh poznanih oblikah reproduciranja, kar obsega tudi pravico shranitve in reproduciranja v kakršnikoli elektronski obliki (23. čl. Zakona o avtorski in sorodnih pravicah – v nadaljevanju ZASP); pravico distribuiranja (24. čl. ZASP); pravico dajanja na voljo javnosti vključno z dajanjem na voljo javnosti prek svetovnega spleta oz. računalniške mreže (32.a čl. ZASP); pravico predelave, zlasti za namen prevoda (33. čl. ZASP). Prenos pravic velja za članek v celoti (vključno s slikami, razpredelnicami in morebitnimi prilogami). Prenos je izključen ter prostorsko in časovno neomejen.
