Opportunities for sustainable development in gastrointestinal endoscopy

A systematic review

Authors

  • Živa Sprogar Diagnostic Centre Bled, Pod skalo 4, 4260 Bled, Slovenia https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4855-8003
  • Saša Kadivec University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik 36, 4204 Golnik, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2026.60.2.3284

Keywords:

green endoscopy, carbon footprint;, environmental impact

Abstract

Introduction: The pursuit of sustainable development and carbon footprint reduction throughout all stages of the gastrointestinal endoscopy process has led to the emergence of the concept of "green endoscopy." The aim of this study was to examine sustainable strategies in gastrointestinal endoscopy and their effectiveness in reducing environmental impact without compromising the quality of health care.
Methods: A systematic review of the scientific literature was conducted. The literature search was performed in the PubMed and ScienceDirect international bibliographic databases, via the ClinicalKey and Wiley Online Library platforms, and Google Scholar. The following keywords were used in English: green endoscopy, carbon footprint, environmental impact; and in Slovenian: zelena endoskopija, ogljični odtis, okoljski vpliv. Articles published between 2018 and 2023, available in Slovenian and English, with full text access, were included in the review. Data were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis.
Results: A total of 15 sources were included in the final analysis. Five content categories were identified: environmental protection, equipment and accessories, patient empowerment, employee empowerment, and patient safety. Although reducing the environmental burden is feasible, it requires a systematic and multidimensional approach that extends beyond mere technical adjustments. Clinical effectiveness is not compromised when sustainable measures are implemented in accordance with relevant guidelines and safety standards.
Discussion and conclusion: Evidence from our qualitative thematic analysis highlights the need for the management of healthcare organisations and individual endoscopy units to take prompt and effective action to reduce environmental pollution and follow a sustainable development plan. By adhering to professional guidelines, it is possible to reduce the environmental footprint while maintaining the quality of health care. Further empirical research is needed to more accurately quantify the carbon footprint across the individual phases of the endoscopic process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., & Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed., pp. 149–152). SAGE Publications.

Cunha Neves, J. A., Roseira, J., Queirós, P., Sousa, H. T., Pellino, G., & Cunha, M. F. (2022). Targeted intervention to achieve waste reduction in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut, 72(2), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327005 PMid:35985798

de Jong, D., Volkers, A., de Ridder, E., Neijenhuis, M., & Duijvestein, M. (2023). Steps toward a greener endoscopy unit. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 21, 2723–2726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2023.06.007 PMid:37330119

de Melo, S. W., Taylor, G. L., & Kao, J. Y. (2021). Packaging and waste in the endoscopy suite. Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 23(4), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tige.2021.07.004

Desai, M., Campbell, C., Perisetti, A., Srinivasan, S., Radadiya, D., Patel, H., Melquist, S., Rex, D. K., & Sharma, P. (2023). The environmental impact of gastrointestinal procedures: A prospective study of waste generation, energy consumption, and auditing in an endoscopy unit. Gastroenterology, 166(3), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2023.12.006 PMid:38123023

Duijvestein, M., Sidhu, R., Zimmermann, K., Carrington, E. V., Hann, A., Sousa, P., Touw, H. R. W., van Hooft, J. E., & Müller, M. (2024). The United European Gastroenterology green paper—climate change and gastroenterology. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 12(9), 1292–1305. https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12698 PMid:39452615; PMCid:PMC11578853

Gayam, S. (2020). Environmental impact of endoscopy: "Scope" of the problem. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 115(12), 1931–1932. https://doi.org/10.14309/AJG.0000000000001005 PMid:33086225

Hernandez, L. V., Agrawal, D., Skole, K. S., Crockett, S. D., Shimpi, R. A., von Renteln, D., & Pohl, H. (2023). Meeting the environmental challenges of endoscopy: A pathway from strategy to implementation. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 98(6), 881–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2023.07.031 PMid:37977670

Lacroute, J., Marcantoni, J., Petitot, S., Weber, J., Levy, P., Dirrenberger, B., Tchoumak, I., Baron, M., Gibert, S., Marguerite, S., Huppertz, J., Gronier, O., & Derlon, A. (2023). The carbon footprint of ambulatory gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy, 55(10), 918–926. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2088-4062 PMid:37156511

Lenzen, M., Malik, A., Li, M., Fry, J., Weisz, H., Pichler, P. P., Chaves, L. S. M., Capon, A., & Pencheon, D. (2020). The environmental footprint of health care: A global assessment. The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(7), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30121-2 PMid:32681898

Maida, M., Vitello, A., Shahini, E., Vassallo, R., Sinagra, E., Pallio, S., Melita, G., Ramai, D., Spadaccini, M., Hassan, C., & Facciorusso, A. (2024). Green endoscopy, one step toward a sustainable future: Literature review. Endoscopy International Open, 12(8), Article a23038621. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2303-8621 PMid:39184060; PMCid:PMC11343619

Martin-Cabezuelo, R., Vilariño-Feltrer, G., Campillo-Fernández, A. J., Lorenzo-Zúñiga, V., Pons, V., López-Muñoz, P., & Tort-Ausina, I. (2023). Materials science toolkit for carbon footprint assessment: A case study for endoscopic accessories of common use. ACS Environmental Au, 4(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.3c00044 PMid:38250342; PMCid:PMC10797683

Maurice, J. B., Siau, K., Sebastian, S., Ahuja, N., Wesley, E., Stableforth, W., & Hayee, B. (2020). Green Endoscopy Network. Green endoscopy: A call for sustainability in the midst of COVID-19. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 5(7), 636–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30157-6 PMid:32553141; PMCid:PMC7295492

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Menini, M., Crisciotti, C., Hassan, C., Rizkala, T., Di Stefano, L., Spadaccini, M., Fumagalli, A., Fugazza, A., Vanni, E., Oliva, P., Iacovino, R., Giordano, S., & Repici, A. (2026). Reducing the environmental impact of gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective study on waste management through waste segregation and staff education. Endoscopy, 58(1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2661-1820 PMid:40829623

Namburar, S., von Renteln, D., Damianos, J., Bradish, L., Barrett, J., Aguilera-Fish, A., Cushman-Roisin, B., & Pohl, H. (2022). Estimating the environmental impact of disposable endoscopic equipment and endoscopes. Gut, 71(7), 1326–1331. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324729 PMid:34853058

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 PMid:33782057; PMCid:PMC8005924

Park, S. B., & Cha, J. M. (2023). Gastrointestinal endoscopy's carbon footprint. Clinical Endoscopy, 56(3), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.003 PMid:36997185; PMCid:PMC10244153

Perisetti, A., Desai, M., Bourke, M. J., Penman, I., Repici, A., Reddy, D. N., Tajiri, H., Rex, D. K., Hassan, C., & Sharma, P. (2023). Production and possible reduction of greenhouse gases produced during GI endoscopy activity: A systematic review of available literature. Gut, 72(3), 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328369 PMid:36522150

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health.

Rao, A., Sultany, A., Gondal, A., Chakinala, R. C., Bharadwaj, H. R., Chandan, S., Ali, H., Malik, S., Alsakarneh, S., & Dahiya, D. S. (2025). Green endoscopy: A review of global perspectives on environmental sustainability of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(11), Article 3936. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113936 PMid:40507697; PMCid:PMC12156243

Rodriguez de Santiago, E., Dinis-Ribeiro, M., Pohl, H., Agrawal, D., Arvanitakis, M., Baddeley, R., Bak, E., Bhandari, P., Bretthauer, M., Burga, P., Donnelly, L., Eickhoff, A., Hayee, B., Kaminski, M. F., Karlović, K., Lorenzo-Zúñiga, V., Pellisé, M., Pioche, M., Siau, K., ... Messmann, H. (2022). Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) position statement. Endoscopy, 54(8), 797–826. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1859-3726 PMid:35803275

Ryu, K., Yoon, W. J., Kim, S. H., Park, D. H., Park, J. H., Bang, K. B., Jeon, T. J., Jung, D. H., & Cho, Y. S. (2025). Current status and trends of green endoscopy. Clinical Endoscopy, 58(4), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2024.332 PMid:40394928; PMCid:PMC12314607

Sebastian, S., Dhar, A., Baddeley, R., Donnelly, L., Haddock, R., Arasaradnam, R., Coulter, A., Disney, B. R., Griffiths, H., Healey, C., Hillson, R., Steinbach, I., Marshall, S., Rajendran, A., Rochford, A., Thomas-Gibson, S., Siddhi, S., Stableforth, W., Wesley, E., ... Hayee, B. (2022). Green endoscopy: British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), Joint Accreditation Group (JAG) and Centre for Sustainable Healthcare (CSH) joint consensus on practical measures for environmental sustainability in endoscopy. Gut, 72(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328460

Siau, K., Hayee, B. H., & Gayam, S. (2021). Endoscopy's current carbon footprint. Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 23(4), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tige.2021.06.005

Siddhi, S., Dhar, A., & Sebastian, S. (2021). Best practices in environmental advocacy and research in endoscopy. Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 23(4), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tige.2021.06.002

Vaccari, M., Tudor, T., & Perteghella, A. (2018). Costs associated with the management of waste from healthcare facilities: An analysis at national and site level. Waste Management & Research, 36(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X17739968 PMid:29132259

Published

2026-07-18

How to Cite

Sprogar, Živa, & Kadivec, S. (2026). Opportunities for sustainable development in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A systematic review. Slovenian Nursing Review, 60(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2026.60.2.3284

Issue

Section

Review article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>