A comparison of frequency of medical interventions and birth outcomes between the midwife led unit and the obstetric unit in low-risk primiparous women
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14528/snr.2014.48.3.16Keywords:
low risk, labour, medical interventions, perinatal outcomesAbstract
Introduction: The purpose of this national research was to compare birth, maternal and newborn outcomes in the midwife led unit and the obstetric unit to ascertain whether a midwife led unit reduced medicalisation of childbirth. Methods: A prospective observational case-control study was carried out in Ljubljana Maternity Hospital in the period May - August 2013. The sample comprised 497 labouring women; 154 who attended the midwife led and 343 who attended in the obstetric unit, both matching the same inclusion criteria: low risk primiparous; singleton term pregnancies, normal foetal heart beat, cephalic presentation; spontaneous onset of labour. The primary outcome was the caesarean section rate. Chi-square test was used to compare medical interventions and birth outcomes. Results: Women in the midwife led unit had statistically significant higher spontaneous vaginal births (p < 0.001), less augmentation with oxytocin (p < 0.001), less use of analgesia (p < 0.001), less operative vaginal deliveries (p < 0.001) and less caesarean sections (p < 0.001), lower rates of episiotomy (p < 0.001) and more exclusively breastfed (p = 0.002). Discussion and conclusion: These significant findings showed that in the midwife led unit fewer medical interventions were used. For generalisation of the findings more similar studies in Slovenia are needed.
Downloads
Metrics
References
American College of Nurse–Midwives., 2013. Supporting healthy and normal physiological childbirth: a consenues statement by ACNM, MANA and NACPM. Journal of Perinatal Education, 22(1), pp. 14-17. PMid:24381472; PMCid:PMC3647729
Berg, M., Asta Ólafsdóttir, O. & Lundgren, I., 2012. A midwifery model of woman – centred childbirth care - in Swedish and Icelandic settings. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, 3(2), pp. 79-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2012.03.001; PMid:22578755
Christiaens, V., 2011. Pregnant women’s fear of childbirth in midwife - and obstetrician-led care in Belgium and the Netherlands: test of the medicalization hypothesis. Womens health, 51(3), pp. 220-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2011.560999; PMid:21547859
Directive 2001/20/EC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use., 2001. Luxembourg: European Parliament and of the Coucil, 2001. Available at: http://www.eortc.be/services/doc/clinical-eu-directive-04-april-01.pdf [15. 6. 2014]
Eide, B.I., Nilsen, A.B.V. & Rasmussen, S., 2009. Births in two different delivery units in the same clinic – a prospective study of healthy primiparous women. BioMed Central Pregnancy and Childbirth, 25(9), pp. 3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-25; PMid:19545412; PMCid:PMC2712449
Government of Western Australia., 2003. KEMH - King Edward Memorial Hospital and antenatal shared care guidelines for general practitioners. 5th ed. Subiaco: Government of Western Australia, pp. 3-23.
Guilliland, K., Tracy, S.K. & Thorogood, J., 2006. Australian and New Zealand health and maternity services. In: Pairman, S., Pincombe, J., Thorogood, C. & Tracy, S. eds. Midwifery: preparation for practice. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, pp. 3 – 33.
Hadjigeorgiou, E., Kouta, C., Papastavrou, E., Papadopoulos, I. & Mårtensson, L.B., 2012. Women's perceptions of their right to choose the place of childbirth: an integrative review. Midwifery, 28(3), pp. 380-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.05.006; PMid:21683487
Hatem, M., Sandall, J., Devane, D., Soltani, H. & Gates, S., 2008. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 8(4), p. CD004667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub2; PMid:18843666
Inhorn, M.C., 2006. Defining women's health: a dozen messages from more than 150 ethnographies. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20(3), pp. 345-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/maq.2006.20.3.345; PMid:16937621
International Confederation of Midwives, 2008a. The midwife is the first choice health professional for childbearing women. Available at: http://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/uploads/documents/Position%20Statements%20-%20English/Reviewed%20PS%20in%202014/PS2008_019%20V2014%20The%20Midwife%20is%20the%20First%20Choice%20ENG.pdf [2.7.2014].
International Confederation of Midwives, 2008b. Keeping birth normal. Available at: http://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/uploads/documents/Position%20Statements%20-%20English/Reviewed%20PS%20in%202014/PS2008_007%20V2014%20Keeping%20Birth%20Normal%20ENG.pdf [2.7.2014].
Janssen, P.A., Ryan, E., Etches, D.J., Klein, M.C. & Reime, B., 2007. Outcomes of planned birth attended by midwives compared with physicians in British Columbia. Birth, 34(2), pp. 140-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00160.x; PMid:17542818
Johanson, R., Newburn, N. & MacFarlane, A., 2002. Has the medicalization of the childbirth gone too far? British Medical Journal, 324, pp. 892-895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7342.892; PMid:11950741; PMCid:PMC1122835
Johnson, M., Stewart, H., Langdon, R., Kelly, P. & Yong, KL., 2003. Women-centred care and caseload models of midwifery. Collegian, 10(1), pp. 30-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60618-6
Jomeen, J. & Martin, C.R., 2008. The impact of choice of maternity care on psychological health outcomes for women during pregnancy and the postnatal period. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 14(3), pp. 391-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00878.x; PMid:18373580
Kitzinger, S., 2011. Birth your way: choosing birth at home or in a birth center. California: DK Publishing , pp. 4-8.
Mann, C.J., 2003. Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional and case-control studies. Emergency Medicine Journal, 20, pp. 54-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emj.20.1.54
McCourt, C., 2006. Supporting choice and control? Communication and interaction between midwives and women at the antenatal booking visit. Social Science and Medicine, 62(6), pp. 1307-1318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.031; PMid:16126316
McLachlan, H.L., Forster, D.A. ,Davey, M.A., Farrell, T., Gold, L., Biro, M.A., et al., 2012. Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 119(12), pp. 1483-1492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03446.x; PMid:22830446
Metcalfe, A., Grabowska, K., Weller, C. & Tough, S.C., 2013. Impact of prenatal care provider on the use of ancillary health services during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 11(13), pp. 62-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-62; PMid:23497179; PMCid:PMC3599935
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence., 2007. Intrapartum care - care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth.1st ed. London: NICE, pp. 14-33.
Odent, M.R., 2013. Synthetic oxytocin and breastfeeding: reasons for testing a hypothesis. Medicine Hypotheses, 81(5), pp. 889-891. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2013.07.044
Overgaard, C., Møller, A.M., Fenger-Grøn, M., Knudsen, L.B. & Sandall, J., 2011. Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women. BMJ Open, 1(2), p. e000262. http.//dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000262; PMid:22021892; PMCID:PMC3191606
Page, L., 2007. Is there enough evidence to judge midwife led units safe? Yes. British Medical Journal, 335(7621), p. 642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39343.471227.AD; PMid:17901510; PMCid:PMC1995510
Parry, D.C., 2008. We wanted a birth experience, not a medical experience: exploring Canadian women's use of midwifery. Health Care Women International, 29(8), pp. 784-806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07399330802269451; PMid:18726792
Pravilnik o sestavi, nalogah, pristojnostih in načinu dela komisije za medicinsko etiko, 1995. Uradni list Republike Slovenije št. 30.
Ryan, P., Revill, P., Devane, D. & Normand, C., 2013. An assessment of the cost-effectiveness of midwife-led care in the United Kingdom. Midwifery, 29(4), pp. 368-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.02.005; PMid:22565064
Sutcliffe, K., Caird, J., Kavanagh, J., Rees, R., Oliver, K., Dickson, K., et al., 2012. Comparing midwife-led and doctor-led maternity care: a systematic review of reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68 (11), pp. 2376-2386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05998.x; PMid:22489571
Suzuki, S., Hiraizumi, Y., Satomi, M. & Miyaha, H., 2011. Midwife-led care unit for ‘low risk’ pregnant women in a Japanese hospital. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 24(8), pp. 1046-1050. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2010.545912; PMid:21231841
Symon, A.G., Dugard, P., Butchart, M., Carr, V. & Paul, J., 2011. Care and environment in midwife-led and obstetric-led units. A comparison of mothers’ and birth partners’ perceptions. Midwifery, 27(8), pp. 880-886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.002; PMid:21251736
Zakon o zdravniški službi (uradno prečiščeno besedilo) (ZZdrS-UPB3), 2006. Uradni list Republike Slovenije št. 72.
Wiegers, T.A., 2009. The quality of maternity care services as experienced by women in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 9, p.18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-18; PMid:19426525; PMCid:PMC2689853
Wiysonge, C.S., 2009. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. The WHO Reproductive Health Library, Geneva: World Health Organization.
World Medical Association, 2000. Declaration of Helsinki - ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Available at: http://www.kme-nmec.si/Docu/HELSINKI2000.pdf [12. 12. 2013].
Yin, R.K., 2003. Applications of case study research. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 55-60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
As the author undersigned hereby, I transfer, assign, or otherwise convey the following authorship rights as comprised in the Copyright and Related Rights Act (CRRA) to the Slovenian Nursing Review, Ob železnici 30A, 1000 Ljubljana: the right of reproduction - the exclusive right to fix the work in a material medium or in another copy directly or indirectly, temporarily or permanently, by any means and in any digital form, in whole or in part (CRRA, Article 23); the right of distribution (CRRA, Article 24); the right of making a work available and accessible through the internet (CRRA, Article 32a); the right of transformation, especially the exclusive right to translate a pre-existing work (CRRA, Article 33). The transfer of author rights applies to the article in its entirety, including pictorial and/or graphic works and possible supplements. The transfer of rights is exclusive and unlimited in duration or territory.
